From 175641a54184a22bdfe85b810531fa62bbb56c05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wassname <1103714+wassname@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:29:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] readme: drop the count word before intrinsic/extrinsic

Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index fd6106e..6a96102 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ So "factually-correct" fits with the dataset, as does "scientifically-supported"
 
 ## What is this?
 
-This is a simplified fork of [unsupervised-elicitation](https://github.com/Jiaxin-Wen/Unsupervised-Elicitation) ([Wen et al. 2025](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10139)) which is a paper that uses in-context metalearning, requiring it to be consistent and mutually predictive. We are using two kinds of signal here
+This is a simplified fork of [unsupervised-elicitation](https://github.com/Jiaxin-Wen/Unsupervised-Elicitation) ([Wen et al. 2025](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.10139)) which is a paper that uses in-context metalearning, requiring it to be consistent and mutually predictive. We are using:
 
 Intrinsic:
 - in-context metalearning e.g. "given these examples complete the pattern"