Instead of having separate ExchangeCalendar and TradingSchedule objects, we
now just have TradingCalendar. The TradingCalendar keeps track of each
session (defined as a contiguous set of minutes between an open and a close).
It's also responsible for handling the grouping logic of any given minute
to its containing session, or the next/previous session if it's not a market
minute for the given calendar.
This commit removes the ability to reference a shared TradingEnvironment through the zipline.finance.trading module. In place, the classes that require a TradingEnvironment, or its child AssetFinder, contain their own references to those objects.
This commit also adds serialization utilities that allow for the pickling/unpickling of objects without unintentionally their TradingEnvironments or AssetFinders.
Instead of using the pandas.Series datetime index for every single
vector, get the index at the beginning of the update loop based on the
dt and then use that index to set the values.
Also, since the dt lookup is no longer needed, store the values as numpy
arrays, which are more lightweight.
Locally, this patch cuts out about 60% of the time spent in the update
method.
The calculations that are expected to change are:
- cumulative.beta
- cumulative.alpha
- cumulative.information
- cumulative.sharpe
- period.sortino
* Explanation of how risk calculations are changing
** Risk Fixes for Both Period and Cumulative
*** Downside Risk
Use sample instead of population for standard deviation.
Add a rounding factor, so that if the two values are close for a given
dt, that they do not count as a downside value, which would throw off
the denominator of the standard deviation of the downside diffs.
*** Standard Deviation Type
Across the board the standard deviation has been standardized to using
a 'sample' calculation, whereas before cumulative risk was monstly using
'population'. Using `ddof=1` with `np.std` calculates as if the values
are a sample.
** Cumulative Risk Fixes
*** Beta
Use the daily algorithm returns and benchmarks instead of annualized
mean returns.
*** Volatility
Use sample instead of population with standard deviation.
The volatility is an input to other calculations so this change affects
Sharpe and Information ratio calculations.
*** Information Ratio
The benchmark returns input is changed from annualized benchmark returns
to the annualized mean returns.
*** Alpha
The benchmark returns input is changed from annualized benchmark returns
to the annualized mean returns.
** Period Risk Fixes
*** Sortino
Use the downside risk of the daily return vs. the mean algorithm returns
for the minimum acceptable return instead of the treasury return.
The above required adding the calculation of the mean algorithm returns
for period risk.
Also, use algorithm_period_returns and tresaury_period_return as the
cumulative Sortino does, instead of using algorithm returns for both
inputs into the Sortino calculation.
* Other Supporting Changes
** answer_key
Add new mappings for downside risk and Sortino as well as
re-address the index mappings because of changes to the answer key
spread sheet.
** test_risk_cumulative
Change the decimal precision to expect higher precision.
The calculations are now more aligned with the answer key, so we can
expect higher precision. In particular now that the standard deviation
type matches everywhere in both the Python implementation and the answer
sheet, the precision of the first value no longer has to be glossed over.
** test_events_through_risk
Change the results which are used as a canary for risk changes,
since we do expect Sharpe to change with this change..
Change the algorithm volatility test to use the same iterkv style
as the rest of the suite, as it was useful to be able to zero in
on the offending date when debugging changes to the risk module.
The input into max drawdown was incorrect, causing the bad results.
i.e. the `compounded_log_returns` were not values representative of
the algorithms total return at a given time, though
`calculate_max_drawdown` was treating the values as if they were.
Instead, use the `algorithm_period_returns` series, which does provide
the total return.
Update risk answer key with an Excel calculation of max drawdown
to help corroborate the calculations.
Also, remove `compounded_log_returns`, (which actually had stopped
being the `compounded_log_returns` at some point), since the max
drawdown was the only calculation using the values in that series.
Python 3 requires submodules to have more explicit pathing, so use
the dot syntax to declare submodules which are in the same directory
as another module.
So that the units match the other risk calculations, also
use annualized returns for beat and alpha.
Update answer key to match values calculated on the first day.
Also, update performance tracker test so that the returns used
are fractional instead of > 1, so that the annualized numbers are
more in line with real world values.
This could perhaps be labelled BUG, as well.
Change the Sharpe (and algorithm volatiilty) value used to compare
algorithms/backtests so that it is annualized and uses daily returns.
Previously, the Sharpe metric was using the same calculation style
as the fixed size periods, i.e. 3 Month, 6 Month, etc., which can
use the geometric mean when comparing against the risk free.
Change the Sharpe calculation to use the arithmetic mean differenc
against the risk free rate, using daily (non-compounded) values.
Also, use annualized mean returns.
Conner Fromknecht