Add roll style which takes the volume of the contracts into account.
If the volume moves from the front to the back before the auto close
date, the roll is put at that session.
Also, factors out some of the common logic shared with calendar based rolls.
Add `.adj('mul')` and `.adj('add')` methods on ContinuousFuture, which
when used with `history`, will calculate and apply adjustments so that
the values are adjusted to account for discounts and premiums during
rolls.
Example usage in an algo:
```
from zipline.api import continuous_future
def initialize(context):
context.cl_add = continuous_future('CL', offset=0, roll='calendar').adj('add')
context.cl_mul = continuous_future('CL', offset=0, roll='calendar').adj('mul')
context.cl = continuous_future('CL', offset=0, roll='calendar')
schedule_function(print_history)
def print_history(context, data):
frame = data.history([context.cl, context.cl_add, context.cl_mul],
['price', 'sid'],
20,
'1d')
print 'unadjusted'
print frame.loc[:, :, context.cl]
print 'adjusted add'
print frame.loc[:, :, context.cl_add]
print 'adjusted mul'
print frame.loc[:, :, context.cl_mul]
```
Enable unadjusted history for continuous futures.
The history array is filled by the values for the underlying contracts,
where the contract used changes based on rolls.
e.g., if a `1d` history window was over the range
`2016-01-20` -> `2016-02-29` with contracts with a suffix of `F16` that
rolls at the beginning of the session on `2016-01-26`, `G16` on
`2016-02-26`, and `H16` on `2016-03-26`. The `2016-01-20` ->
`2016-01-25` portion would use the values for `F16', the `2016-01-26` ->
`2016-02-25` portion would use `G16` and the `2016-02-26` ->
`2016-02-29` portion would use `H16`.
Using the same contracts as above, a `1m` history window over the range
(using a timezone of US/Eastern) `2016-01-25 4:00PM` -> `2016-01-25
7:00PM` would fill the `4:00PM` -> `6:00PM` portion with data for `F16`
and the `6:01PM` -> `7:00PM` portion with data for `G16`, since the
beginning of the `2016-01-26` session is `2016-01-25 6:01PM`.
Supports `1d` and `1m`.
Also adds the `sid` field to `history` to assist in showing the active
contract at each dt in the window.
Add `chain`field to current, as well as supporting methods in DataPortal
and OrderedContracts.
Enables the following example:
```
from zipline.api import continuous_future
def initialize(context):
context.primary_cl = continuous_future('CL', offset=0, roll='calendar')
schedule_function(print_current_chain)
def print_current_chain(context, data):
chain = data.current_chain(context.primary_cl)
print 'datetime={0}'.format(get_datetime())
print 'primary={0}'.format(chain[0])
print 'secondary={0}'.format(chain[1])
print 'tertiary={0}'.format(chain[2])
```
```
datetime=2015-12-23 14:31:00+00:00
primary=Future(1058201602 [CLG16])
secondary=Future(1058201603 [CLH16])
tertiary=Future(1058201604 [CLJ16])
```
Also:
- make return types of OrderedContracts methods compatible across
architectures. (Noticed while adding `active_chain` method.)
- Add year suffix to future contract names in test data.
Add the ability for an algorithm to request the current contract for a
future chain via `data.current`.
e.g.:
```
data.current(ContinuousFuture('CL', offset=0, roll='calendar'),
'contract')
```
`future_chain` will be replaced by the as yet to be implemented method,
`data.current_chain`
Also removing `FutureChain` which will be replaced by another version
which only supports indexing and iteration.
No longer auto-updates its internal as-of date, instead requires an explicit
as-of date from the consumer.
Take a static list of contracts (instead of needing an assetfinder).
Instead of the as_of method, the user-facing API now lets you pass in an
offset, which is defined as an integral number of sessions.
* BUG: Fixes asset writer to the select the latest asset to hold a sid
When constructing the asset_info dataframe, we were previously taking
the first symbol/sid pair to include, when we should be taking the most
recent.
* Ensure groups are sorted by increasing end_date
* Updates test_lookup_symbol_change_ticker to also cover asset_name
Changes the overlap behavior so that it is an error to write data which
would have two companies holding the same ticker. Other than one test
around which company would win in that case, all the other tests are
passing. That single test has been changed to check the write-time
error.
Scott Sanderson