Files
catalyst/tests/test_finance.py
T
Scott Sanderson 119a1a4cda ENH: Update ordering API to support new ExecutionStyle class in favor of
existing `limit_price` and `stop_price` parameters.  The goal of this change is
to refactor the existing ordering API to provide a cleaner interface for
defining more complex order types.

Adds a new module, zipline.finance.execution, which defines the ExecutionStyle
abstract base class, along with concrete MarketOrder, LimitOrder, StopOrder,
and StopLimitOrder subclasses.

Adds a new `style` keyword argument to the function signature of the `order`
API method, which accepts an instance of ExecutionStyle.

The existing limit_price and stop_price parameters are still supported at this
time, but are converted into the new ExecutionStyle objects before being passed
to Blotter.order.
2014-04-22 23:22:21 -04:00

432 lines
15 KiB
Python

#
# Copyright 2013 Quantopian, Inc.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
"""
Tests for the zipline.finance package
"""
import itertools
import operator
import pytz
from unittest import TestCase
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
import numpy as np
from nose.tools import timed
from six.moves import range
import zipline.protocol
from zipline.protocol import Event, DATASOURCE_TYPE
import zipline.utils.factory as factory
import zipline.utils.simfactory as simfactory
from zipline.finance.blotter import Blotter
from zipline.gens.composites import date_sorted_sources
from zipline.finance import trading
from zipline.finance.execution import MarketOrder, LimitOrder
from zipline.finance.trading import SimulationParameters
from zipline.finance.performance import PerformanceTracker
from zipline.utils.test_utils import(
setup_logger,
teardown_logger,
assert_single_position
)
DEFAULT_TIMEOUT = 15 # seconds
EXTENDED_TIMEOUT = 90
class FinanceTestCase(TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.zipline_test_config = {
'sid': 133,
}
setup_logger(self)
def tearDown(self):
teardown_logger(self)
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
def test_factory_daily(self):
sim_params = factory.create_simulation_parameters()
trade_source = factory.create_daily_trade_source(
[133],
200,
sim_params
)
prev = None
for trade in trade_source:
if prev:
self.assertTrue(trade.dt > prev.dt)
prev = trade
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
def test_trading_environment(self):
# holidays taken from: http://www.nyse.com/press/1191407641943.html
new_years = datetime(2008, 1, 1, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
mlk_day = datetime(2008, 1, 21, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
presidents = datetime(2008, 2, 18, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
good_friday = datetime(2008, 3, 21, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
memorial_day = datetime(2008, 5, 26, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
july_4th = datetime(2008, 7, 4, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
labor_day = datetime(2008, 9, 1, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
tgiving = datetime(2008, 11, 27, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
christmas = datetime(2008, 5, 25, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
a_saturday = datetime(2008, 8, 2, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
a_sunday = datetime(2008, 10, 12, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
holidays = [
new_years,
mlk_day,
presidents,
good_friday,
memorial_day,
july_4th,
labor_day,
tgiving,
christmas,
a_saturday,
a_sunday
]
for holiday in holidays:
self.assertTrue(not trading.environment.is_trading_day(holiday))
first_trading_day = datetime(2008, 1, 2, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
last_trading_day = datetime(2008, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
workdays = [first_trading_day, last_trading_day]
for workday in workdays:
self.assertTrue(trading.environment.is_trading_day(workday))
def test_simulation_parameters(self):
env = SimulationParameters(
period_start=datetime(2008, 1, 1, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
period_end=datetime(2008, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
capital_base=100000,
)
self.assertTrue(env.last_close.month == 12)
self.assertTrue(env.last_close.day == 31)
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
def test_sim_params_days_in_period(self):
# January 2008
# Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
# 1 2 3 4 5
# 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
# 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
# 27 28 29 30 31
env = SimulationParameters(
period_start=datetime(2007, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
period_end=datetime(2008, 1, 7, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
capital_base=100000,
)
expected_trading_days = (
datetime(2007, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
# Skip new years
# holidays taken from: http://www.nyse.com/press/1191407641943.html
datetime(2008, 1, 2, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
datetime(2008, 1, 3, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
datetime(2008, 1, 4, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
# Skip Saturday
# Skip Sunday
datetime(2008, 1, 7, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
)
num_expected_trading_days = 5
self.assertEquals(num_expected_trading_days, env.days_in_period)
np.testing.assert_array_equal(expected_trading_days,
env.trading_days.tolist())
@timed(EXTENDED_TIMEOUT)
def test_full_zipline(self):
# provide enough trades to ensure all orders are filled.
self.zipline_test_config['order_count'] = 100
# making a small order amount, so that each order is filled
# in a single transaction, and txn_count == order_count.
self.zipline_test_config['order_amount'] = 25
# No transactions can be filled on the first trade, so
# we have one extra trade to ensure all orders are filled.
self.zipline_test_config['trade_count'] = 101
full_zipline = simfactory.create_test_zipline(
**self.zipline_test_config)
assert_single_position(self, full_zipline)
# TODO: write tests for short sales
# TODO: write a test to do massive buying or shorting.
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
def test_partially_filled_orders(self):
# create a scenario where order size and trade size are equal
# so that orders must be spread out over several trades.
params = {
'trade_count': 360,
'trade_amount': 100,
'trade_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
'order_count': 2,
'order_amount': 100,
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
# because we placed an order for 100 shares, and the volume
# of each trade is 100, the simulator should spread the order
# into 4 trades of 25 shares per order.
'expected_txn_count': 8,
'expected_txn_volume': 2 * 100
}
self.transaction_sim(**params)
# same scenario, but with short sales
params2 = {
'trade_count': 360,
'trade_amount': 100,
'trade_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
'order_count': 2,
'order_amount': -100,
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
'expected_txn_count': 8,
'expected_txn_volume': 2 * -100
}
self.transaction_sim(**params2)
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
def test_collapsing_orders(self):
# create a scenario where order.amount <<< trade.volume
# to test that several orders can be covered properly by one trade,
# but are represented by multiple transactions.
params1 = {
'trade_count': 6,
'trade_amount': 100,
'trade_interval': timedelta(hours=1),
'order_count': 24,
'order_amount': 1,
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
# because we placed an orders totaling less than 25% of one trade
# the simulator should produce just one transaction.
'expected_txn_count': 24,
'expected_txn_volume': 24
}
self.transaction_sim(**params1)
# second verse, same as the first. except short!
params2 = {
'trade_count': 6,
'trade_amount': 100,
'trade_interval': timedelta(hours=1),
'order_count': 24,
'order_amount': -1,
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
'expected_txn_count': 24,
'expected_txn_volume': -24
}
self.transaction_sim(**params2)
# Runs the collapsed trades over daily trade intervals.
# Ensuring that our delay works for daily intervals as well.
params3 = {
'trade_count': 6,
'trade_amount': 100,
'trade_interval': timedelta(days=1),
'order_count': 24,
'order_amount': 1,
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
'expected_txn_count': 24,
'expected_txn_volume': 24
}
self.transaction_sim(**params3)
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
def test_alternating_long_short(self):
# create a scenario where we alternate buys and sells
params1 = {
'trade_count': int(6.5 * 60 * 4),
'trade_amount': 100,
'trade_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
'order_count': 4,
'order_amount': 10,
'order_interval': timedelta(hours=24),
'alternate': True,
'complete_fill': True,
'expected_txn_count': 4,
'expected_txn_volume': 0 # equal buys and sells
}
self.transaction_sim(**params1)
def transaction_sim(self, **params):
""" This is a utility method that asserts expected
results for conversion of orders to transactions given a
trade history"""
trade_count = params['trade_count']
trade_interval = params['trade_interval']
order_count = params['order_count']
order_amount = params['order_amount']
order_interval = params['order_interval']
expected_txn_count = params['expected_txn_count']
expected_txn_volume = params['expected_txn_volume']
# optional parameters
# ---------------------
# if present, alternate between long and short sales
alternate = params.get('alternate')
# if present, expect transaction amounts to match orders exactly.
complete_fill = params.get('complete_fill')
sid = 1
sim_params = factory.create_simulation_parameters()
blotter = Blotter()
price = [10.1] * trade_count
volume = [100] * trade_count
start_date = sim_params.first_open
generated_trades = factory.create_trade_history(
sid,
price,
volume,
trade_interval,
sim_params
)
if alternate:
alternator = -1
else:
alternator = 1
order_date = start_date
for i in range(order_count):
blotter.set_date(order_date)
blotter.order(sid, order_amount * alternator ** i, MarketOrder())
order_date = order_date + order_interval
# move after market orders to just after market next
# market open.
if order_date.hour >= 21:
if order_date.minute >= 00:
order_date = order_date + timedelta(days=1)
order_date = order_date.replace(hour=14, minute=30)
# there should now be one open order list stored under the sid
oo = blotter.open_orders
self.assertEqual(len(oo), 1)
self.assertTrue(sid in oo)
order_list = oo[sid]
self.assertEqual(order_count, len(order_list))
for i in range(order_count):
order = order_list[i]
self.assertEqual(order.sid, sid)
self.assertEqual(order.amount, order_amount * alternator ** i)
tracker = PerformanceTracker(sim_params)
benchmark_returns = [
Event({'dt': dt,
'returns': ret,
'type':
zipline.protocol.DATASOURCE_TYPE.BENCHMARK,
'source_id': 'benchmarks'})
for dt, ret in trading.environment.benchmark_returns.iterkv()
if dt.date() >= sim_params.period_start.date()
and dt.date() <= sim_params.period_end.date()
]
generated_events = date_sorted_sources(generated_trades,
benchmark_returns)
# this approximates the loop inside TradingSimulationClient
transactions = []
for dt, events in itertools.groupby(generated_events,
operator.attrgetter('dt')):
for event in events:
if event.type == DATASOURCE_TYPE.TRADE:
for txn, order in blotter.process_trade(event):
transactions.append(txn)
tracker.process_event(txn)
tracker.process_event(event)
if complete_fill:
self.assertEqual(len(transactions), len(order_list))
total_volume = 0
for i in range(len(transactions)):
txn = transactions[i]
total_volume += txn.amount
if complete_fill:
order = order_list[i]
self.assertEqual(order.amount, txn.amount)
self.assertEqual(total_volume, expected_txn_volume)
self.assertEqual(len(transactions), expected_txn_count)
cumulative_pos = tracker.cumulative_performance.positions[sid]
self.assertEqual(total_volume, cumulative_pos.amount)
# the open orders should now be empty
oo = blotter.open_orders
self.assertTrue(sid in oo)
order_list = oo[sid]
self.assertEqual(0, len(order_list))
def test_blotter_processes_splits(self):
sim_params = factory.create_simulation_parameters()
blotter = Blotter()
blotter.set_date(sim_params.period_start)
# set up two open limit orders with very low limit prices,
# one for sid 1 and one for sid 2
blotter.order(1, 100, LimitOrder(10))
blotter.order(2, 100, LimitOrder(10))
# send in a split for sid 2
split_event = factory.create_split(2, 0.33333,
sim_params.period_start +
timedelta(days=1))
blotter.process_split(split_event)
for sid in [1, 2]:
order_lists = blotter.open_orders[sid]
self.assertIsNotNone(order_lists)
self.assertEqual(1, len(order_lists))
aapl_order = blotter.open_orders[1][0].to_dict()
fls_order = blotter.open_orders[2][0].to_dict()
# make sure the aapl order didn't change
self.assertEqual(100, aapl_order['amount'])
self.assertEqual(10, aapl_order['limit'])
self.assertEqual(1, aapl_order['sid'])
# make sure the fls order did change
# to 300 shares at 3.33
self.assertEqual(300, fls_order['amount'])
self.assertEqual(3.33, fls_order['limit'])
self.assertEqual(2, fls_order['sid'])