mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/catalyst.git
synced 2026-06-28 17:00:51 +08:00
119a1a4cda
existing `limit_price` and `stop_price` parameters. The goal of this change is to refactor the existing ordering API to provide a cleaner interface for defining more complex order types. Adds a new module, zipline.finance.execution, which defines the ExecutionStyle abstract base class, along with concrete MarketOrder, LimitOrder, StopOrder, and StopLimitOrder subclasses. Adds a new `style` keyword argument to the function signature of the `order` API method, which accepts an instance of ExecutionStyle. The existing limit_price and stop_price parameters are still supported at this time, but are converted into the new ExecutionStyle objects before being passed to Blotter.order.
432 lines
15 KiB
Python
432 lines
15 KiB
Python
#
|
|
# Copyright 2013 Quantopian, Inc.
|
|
#
|
|
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
#
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
#
|
|
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
# limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests for the zipline.finance package
|
|
"""
|
|
import itertools
|
|
import operator
|
|
|
|
import pytz
|
|
|
|
from unittest import TestCase
|
|
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
|
|
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
from nose.tools import timed
|
|
|
|
from six.moves import range
|
|
|
|
import zipline.protocol
|
|
from zipline.protocol import Event, DATASOURCE_TYPE
|
|
|
|
import zipline.utils.factory as factory
|
|
import zipline.utils.simfactory as simfactory
|
|
|
|
from zipline.finance.blotter import Blotter
|
|
from zipline.gens.composites import date_sorted_sources
|
|
|
|
from zipline.finance import trading
|
|
from zipline.finance.execution import MarketOrder, LimitOrder
|
|
from zipline.finance.trading import SimulationParameters
|
|
|
|
from zipline.finance.performance import PerformanceTracker
|
|
from zipline.utils.test_utils import(
|
|
setup_logger,
|
|
teardown_logger,
|
|
assert_single_position
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
DEFAULT_TIMEOUT = 15 # seconds
|
|
EXTENDED_TIMEOUT = 90
|
|
|
|
|
|
class FinanceTestCase(TestCase):
|
|
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
self.zipline_test_config = {
|
|
'sid': 133,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
setup_logger(self)
|
|
|
|
def tearDown(self):
|
|
teardown_logger(self)
|
|
|
|
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
|
|
def test_factory_daily(self):
|
|
sim_params = factory.create_simulation_parameters()
|
|
trade_source = factory.create_daily_trade_source(
|
|
[133],
|
|
200,
|
|
sim_params
|
|
)
|
|
prev = None
|
|
for trade in trade_source:
|
|
if prev:
|
|
self.assertTrue(trade.dt > prev.dt)
|
|
prev = trade
|
|
|
|
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
|
|
def test_trading_environment(self):
|
|
# holidays taken from: http://www.nyse.com/press/1191407641943.html
|
|
new_years = datetime(2008, 1, 1, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
mlk_day = datetime(2008, 1, 21, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
presidents = datetime(2008, 2, 18, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
good_friday = datetime(2008, 3, 21, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
memorial_day = datetime(2008, 5, 26, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
july_4th = datetime(2008, 7, 4, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
labor_day = datetime(2008, 9, 1, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
tgiving = datetime(2008, 11, 27, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
christmas = datetime(2008, 5, 25, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
a_saturday = datetime(2008, 8, 2, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
a_sunday = datetime(2008, 10, 12, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
holidays = [
|
|
new_years,
|
|
mlk_day,
|
|
presidents,
|
|
good_friday,
|
|
memorial_day,
|
|
july_4th,
|
|
labor_day,
|
|
tgiving,
|
|
christmas,
|
|
a_saturday,
|
|
a_sunday
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
for holiday in holidays:
|
|
self.assertTrue(not trading.environment.is_trading_day(holiday))
|
|
|
|
first_trading_day = datetime(2008, 1, 2, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
last_trading_day = datetime(2008, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
workdays = [first_trading_day, last_trading_day]
|
|
|
|
for workday in workdays:
|
|
self.assertTrue(trading.environment.is_trading_day(workday))
|
|
|
|
def test_simulation_parameters(self):
|
|
env = SimulationParameters(
|
|
period_start=datetime(2008, 1, 1, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
period_end=datetime(2008, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
capital_base=100000,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertTrue(env.last_close.month == 12)
|
|
self.assertTrue(env.last_close.day == 31)
|
|
|
|
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
|
|
def test_sim_params_days_in_period(self):
|
|
|
|
# January 2008
|
|
# Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
|
|
# 1 2 3 4 5
|
|
# 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
|
|
# 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
|
|
# 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
|
|
# 27 28 29 30 31
|
|
|
|
env = SimulationParameters(
|
|
period_start=datetime(2007, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
period_end=datetime(2008, 1, 7, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
capital_base=100000,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
expected_trading_days = (
|
|
datetime(2007, 12, 31, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
# Skip new years
|
|
# holidays taken from: http://www.nyse.com/press/1191407641943.html
|
|
datetime(2008, 1, 2, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
datetime(2008, 1, 3, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
datetime(2008, 1, 4, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
# Skip Saturday
|
|
# Skip Sunday
|
|
datetime(2008, 1, 7, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
num_expected_trading_days = 5
|
|
self.assertEquals(num_expected_trading_days, env.days_in_period)
|
|
np.testing.assert_array_equal(expected_trading_days,
|
|
env.trading_days.tolist())
|
|
|
|
@timed(EXTENDED_TIMEOUT)
|
|
def test_full_zipline(self):
|
|
# provide enough trades to ensure all orders are filled.
|
|
self.zipline_test_config['order_count'] = 100
|
|
# making a small order amount, so that each order is filled
|
|
# in a single transaction, and txn_count == order_count.
|
|
self.zipline_test_config['order_amount'] = 25
|
|
# No transactions can be filled on the first trade, so
|
|
# we have one extra trade to ensure all orders are filled.
|
|
self.zipline_test_config['trade_count'] = 101
|
|
full_zipline = simfactory.create_test_zipline(
|
|
**self.zipline_test_config)
|
|
assert_single_position(self, full_zipline)
|
|
|
|
# TODO: write tests for short sales
|
|
# TODO: write a test to do massive buying or shorting.
|
|
|
|
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
|
|
def test_partially_filled_orders(self):
|
|
|
|
# create a scenario where order size and trade size are equal
|
|
# so that orders must be spread out over several trades.
|
|
params = {
|
|
'trade_count': 360,
|
|
'trade_amount': 100,
|
|
'trade_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
'order_count': 2,
|
|
'order_amount': 100,
|
|
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
# because we placed an order for 100 shares, and the volume
|
|
# of each trade is 100, the simulator should spread the order
|
|
# into 4 trades of 25 shares per order.
|
|
'expected_txn_count': 8,
|
|
'expected_txn_volume': 2 * 100
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
self.transaction_sim(**params)
|
|
|
|
# same scenario, but with short sales
|
|
params2 = {
|
|
'trade_count': 360,
|
|
'trade_amount': 100,
|
|
'trade_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
'order_count': 2,
|
|
'order_amount': -100,
|
|
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
'expected_txn_count': 8,
|
|
'expected_txn_volume': 2 * -100
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
self.transaction_sim(**params2)
|
|
|
|
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
|
|
def test_collapsing_orders(self):
|
|
# create a scenario where order.amount <<< trade.volume
|
|
# to test that several orders can be covered properly by one trade,
|
|
# but are represented by multiple transactions.
|
|
params1 = {
|
|
'trade_count': 6,
|
|
'trade_amount': 100,
|
|
'trade_interval': timedelta(hours=1),
|
|
'order_count': 24,
|
|
'order_amount': 1,
|
|
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
# because we placed an orders totaling less than 25% of one trade
|
|
# the simulator should produce just one transaction.
|
|
'expected_txn_count': 24,
|
|
'expected_txn_volume': 24
|
|
}
|
|
self.transaction_sim(**params1)
|
|
|
|
# second verse, same as the first. except short!
|
|
params2 = {
|
|
'trade_count': 6,
|
|
'trade_amount': 100,
|
|
'trade_interval': timedelta(hours=1),
|
|
'order_count': 24,
|
|
'order_amount': -1,
|
|
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
'expected_txn_count': 24,
|
|
'expected_txn_volume': -24
|
|
}
|
|
self.transaction_sim(**params2)
|
|
|
|
# Runs the collapsed trades over daily trade intervals.
|
|
# Ensuring that our delay works for daily intervals as well.
|
|
params3 = {
|
|
'trade_count': 6,
|
|
'trade_amount': 100,
|
|
'trade_interval': timedelta(days=1),
|
|
'order_count': 24,
|
|
'order_amount': 1,
|
|
'order_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
'expected_txn_count': 24,
|
|
'expected_txn_volume': 24
|
|
}
|
|
self.transaction_sim(**params3)
|
|
|
|
@timed(DEFAULT_TIMEOUT)
|
|
def test_alternating_long_short(self):
|
|
# create a scenario where we alternate buys and sells
|
|
params1 = {
|
|
'trade_count': int(6.5 * 60 * 4),
|
|
'trade_amount': 100,
|
|
'trade_interval': timedelta(minutes=1),
|
|
'order_count': 4,
|
|
'order_amount': 10,
|
|
'order_interval': timedelta(hours=24),
|
|
'alternate': True,
|
|
'complete_fill': True,
|
|
'expected_txn_count': 4,
|
|
'expected_txn_volume': 0 # equal buys and sells
|
|
}
|
|
self.transaction_sim(**params1)
|
|
|
|
def transaction_sim(self, **params):
|
|
""" This is a utility method that asserts expected
|
|
results for conversion of orders to transactions given a
|
|
trade history"""
|
|
|
|
trade_count = params['trade_count']
|
|
trade_interval = params['trade_interval']
|
|
order_count = params['order_count']
|
|
order_amount = params['order_amount']
|
|
order_interval = params['order_interval']
|
|
expected_txn_count = params['expected_txn_count']
|
|
expected_txn_volume = params['expected_txn_volume']
|
|
# optional parameters
|
|
# ---------------------
|
|
# if present, alternate between long and short sales
|
|
alternate = params.get('alternate')
|
|
# if present, expect transaction amounts to match orders exactly.
|
|
complete_fill = params.get('complete_fill')
|
|
|
|
sid = 1
|
|
sim_params = factory.create_simulation_parameters()
|
|
blotter = Blotter()
|
|
price = [10.1] * trade_count
|
|
volume = [100] * trade_count
|
|
start_date = sim_params.first_open
|
|
|
|
generated_trades = factory.create_trade_history(
|
|
sid,
|
|
price,
|
|
volume,
|
|
trade_interval,
|
|
sim_params
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if alternate:
|
|
alternator = -1
|
|
else:
|
|
alternator = 1
|
|
|
|
order_date = start_date
|
|
for i in range(order_count):
|
|
|
|
blotter.set_date(order_date)
|
|
blotter.order(sid, order_amount * alternator ** i, MarketOrder())
|
|
|
|
order_date = order_date + order_interval
|
|
# move after market orders to just after market next
|
|
# market open.
|
|
if order_date.hour >= 21:
|
|
if order_date.minute >= 00:
|
|
order_date = order_date + timedelta(days=1)
|
|
order_date = order_date.replace(hour=14, minute=30)
|
|
|
|
# there should now be one open order list stored under the sid
|
|
oo = blotter.open_orders
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(oo), 1)
|
|
self.assertTrue(sid in oo)
|
|
order_list = oo[sid]
|
|
self.assertEqual(order_count, len(order_list))
|
|
|
|
for i in range(order_count):
|
|
order = order_list[i]
|
|
self.assertEqual(order.sid, sid)
|
|
self.assertEqual(order.amount, order_amount * alternator ** i)
|
|
|
|
tracker = PerformanceTracker(sim_params)
|
|
|
|
benchmark_returns = [
|
|
Event({'dt': dt,
|
|
'returns': ret,
|
|
'type':
|
|
zipline.protocol.DATASOURCE_TYPE.BENCHMARK,
|
|
'source_id': 'benchmarks'})
|
|
for dt, ret in trading.environment.benchmark_returns.iterkv()
|
|
if dt.date() >= sim_params.period_start.date()
|
|
and dt.date() <= sim_params.period_end.date()
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
generated_events = date_sorted_sources(generated_trades,
|
|
benchmark_returns)
|
|
|
|
# this approximates the loop inside TradingSimulationClient
|
|
transactions = []
|
|
for dt, events in itertools.groupby(generated_events,
|
|
operator.attrgetter('dt')):
|
|
for event in events:
|
|
if event.type == DATASOURCE_TYPE.TRADE:
|
|
|
|
for txn, order in blotter.process_trade(event):
|
|
transactions.append(txn)
|
|
tracker.process_event(txn)
|
|
|
|
tracker.process_event(event)
|
|
|
|
if complete_fill:
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(transactions), len(order_list))
|
|
|
|
total_volume = 0
|
|
for i in range(len(transactions)):
|
|
txn = transactions[i]
|
|
total_volume += txn.amount
|
|
if complete_fill:
|
|
order = order_list[i]
|
|
self.assertEqual(order.amount, txn.amount)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(total_volume, expected_txn_volume)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(transactions), expected_txn_count)
|
|
|
|
cumulative_pos = tracker.cumulative_performance.positions[sid]
|
|
self.assertEqual(total_volume, cumulative_pos.amount)
|
|
|
|
# the open orders should now be empty
|
|
oo = blotter.open_orders
|
|
self.assertTrue(sid in oo)
|
|
order_list = oo[sid]
|
|
self.assertEqual(0, len(order_list))
|
|
|
|
def test_blotter_processes_splits(self):
|
|
sim_params = factory.create_simulation_parameters()
|
|
blotter = Blotter()
|
|
blotter.set_date(sim_params.period_start)
|
|
|
|
# set up two open limit orders with very low limit prices,
|
|
# one for sid 1 and one for sid 2
|
|
blotter.order(1, 100, LimitOrder(10))
|
|
blotter.order(2, 100, LimitOrder(10))
|
|
|
|
# send in a split for sid 2
|
|
split_event = factory.create_split(2, 0.33333,
|
|
sim_params.period_start +
|
|
timedelta(days=1))
|
|
|
|
blotter.process_split(split_event)
|
|
|
|
for sid in [1, 2]:
|
|
order_lists = blotter.open_orders[sid]
|
|
self.assertIsNotNone(order_lists)
|
|
self.assertEqual(1, len(order_lists))
|
|
|
|
aapl_order = blotter.open_orders[1][0].to_dict()
|
|
fls_order = blotter.open_orders[2][0].to_dict()
|
|
|
|
# make sure the aapl order didn't change
|
|
self.assertEqual(100, aapl_order['amount'])
|
|
self.assertEqual(10, aapl_order['limit'])
|
|
self.assertEqual(1, aapl_order['sid'])
|
|
|
|
# make sure the fls order did change
|
|
# to 300 shares at 3.33
|
|
self.assertEqual(300, fls_order['amount'])
|
|
self.assertEqual(3.33, fls_order['limit'])
|
|
self.assertEqual(2, fls_order['sid'])
|