mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/catalyst.git
synced 2026-07-10 11:46:56 +08:00
7cc24cec1f
The calculations that are expected to change are:
- cumulative.beta
- cumulative.alpha
- cumulative.information
- cumulative.sharpe
- period.sortino
* Explanation of how risk calculations are changing
** Risk Fixes for Both Period and Cumulative
*** Downside Risk
Use sample instead of population for standard deviation.
Add a rounding factor, so that if the two values are close for a given
dt, that they do not count as a downside value, which would throw off
the denominator of the standard deviation of the downside diffs.
*** Standard Deviation Type
Across the board the standard deviation has been standardized to using
a 'sample' calculation, whereas before cumulative risk was monstly using
'population'. Using `ddof=1` with `np.std` calculates as if the values
are a sample.
** Cumulative Risk Fixes
*** Beta
Use the daily algorithm returns and benchmarks instead of annualized
mean returns.
*** Volatility
Use sample instead of population with standard deviation.
The volatility is an input to other calculations so this change affects
Sharpe and Information ratio calculations.
*** Information Ratio
The benchmark returns input is changed from annualized benchmark returns
to the annualized mean returns.
*** Alpha
The benchmark returns input is changed from annualized benchmark returns
to the annualized mean returns.
** Period Risk Fixes
*** Sortino
Use the downside risk of the daily return vs. the mean algorithm returns
for the minimum acceptable return instead of the treasury return.
The above required adding the calculation of the mean algorithm returns
for period risk.
Also, use algorithm_period_returns and tresaury_period_return as the
cumulative Sortino does, instead of using algorithm returns for both
inputs into the Sortino calculation.
* Other Supporting Changes
** answer_key
Add new mappings for downside risk and Sortino as well as
re-address the index mappings because of changes to the answer key
spread sheet.
** test_risk_cumulative
Change the decimal precision to expect higher precision.
The calculations are now more aligned with the answer key, so we can
expect higher precision. In particular now that the standard deviation
type matches everywhere in both the Python implementation and the answer
sheet, the precision of the first value no longer has to be glossed over.
** test_events_through_risk
Change the results which are used as a canary for risk changes,
since we do expect Sharpe to change with this change..
608 lines
23 KiB
Python
608 lines
23 KiB
Python
#
|
|
# Copyright 2013 Quantopian, Inc.
|
|
#
|
|
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
#
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
#
|
|
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
# limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
import unittest
|
|
import datetime
|
|
import calendar
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
import pytz
|
|
import zipline.finance.risk as risk
|
|
from zipline.utils import factory
|
|
|
|
from zipline.finance.trading import SimulationParameters
|
|
|
|
from . import answer_key
|
|
from . answer_key import AnswerKey
|
|
|
|
ANSWER_KEY = AnswerKey()
|
|
|
|
RETURNS = ANSWER_KEY.RETURNS
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestRisk(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
|
|
start_date = datetime.datetime(
|
|
year=2006,
|
|
month=1,
|
|
day=1,
|
|
hour=0,
|
|
minute=0,
|
|
tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
end_date = datetime.datetime(
|
|
year=2006, month=12, day=31, tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
|
|
self.sim_params = SimulationParameters(
|
|
period_start=start_date,
|
|
period_end=end_date
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.algo_returns_06 = factory.create_returns_from_list(
|
|
RETURNS,
|
|
self.sim_params
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.benchmark_returns_06 = \
|
|
answer_key.RETURNS_DATA['Benchmark Returns']
|
|
|
|
self.metrics_06 = risk.RiskReport(
|
|
self.algo_returns_06,
|
|
self.sim_params,
|
|
benchmark_returns=self.benchmark_returns_06,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
start_08 = datetime.datetime(
|
|
year=2008,
|
|
month=1,
|
|
day=1,
|
|
hour=0,
|
|
minute=0,
|
|
tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
|
|
end_08 = datetime.datetime(
|
|
year=2008,
|
|
month=12,
|
|
day=31,
|
|
tzinfo=pytz.utc
|
|
)
|
|
self.sim_params08 = SimulationParameters(
|
|
period_start=start_08,
|
|
period_end=end_08
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def tearDown(self):
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
def test_factory(self):
|
|
returns = [0.1] * 100
|
|
r_objects = factory.create_returns_from_list(returns, self.sim_params)
|
|
self.assertTrue(r_objects.index[-1] <=
|
|
datetime.datetime(
|
|
year=2006, month=12, day=31, tzinfo=pytz.utc))
|
|
|
|
def test_drawdown(self):
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_list(
|
|
[1.0, -0.5, 0.8, .17, 1.0, -0.1, -0.45], self.sim_params)
|
|
# 200, 100, 180, 210.6, 421.2, 379.8, 208.494
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskMetricsPeriod(returns.index[0],
|
|
returns.index[-1],
|
|
returns)
|
|
self.assertEqual(metrics.max_drawdown, 0.505)
|
|
|
|
def test_benchmark_returns_06(self):
|
|
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_RETURNS['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_RETURNS['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_RETURNS['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_RETURNS['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_trading_days_06(self):
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_range(self.sim_params)
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskReport(returns, self.sim_params)
|
|
self.assertEqual([x.num_trading_days for x in metrics.year_periods],
|
|
[251])
|
|
self.assertEqual([x.num_trading_days for x in metrics.month_periods],
|
|
[20, 19, 23, 19, 22, 22, 20, 23, 20, 22, 21, 20])
|
|
|
|
def test_benchmark_volatility_06(self):
|
|
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.BENCHMARK_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_returns_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_RETURNS['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_RETURNS['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_RETURNS['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_period_returns
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_RETURNS['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_volatility_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_volatility
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_VOLATILITY['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_sharpe_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sharpe for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SHARPE['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sharpe for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SHARPE['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sharpe for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SHARPE['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sharpe for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SHARPE['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_downside_risk_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.downside_risk for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_DOWNSIDE_RISK['Monthly'],
|
|
decimal=4)
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.downside_risk for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_DOWNSIDE_RISK['3-Month'],
|
|
decimal=4)
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.downside_risk for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_DOWNSIDE_RISK['6-month'],
|
|
decimal=4)
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.downside_risk for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_DOWNSIDE_RISK['year'],
|
|
decimal=4)
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_sortino_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sortino for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SORTINO['Monthly'],
|
|
decimal=3)
|
|
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sortino for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SORTINO['3-Month'],
|
|
decimal=3)
|
|
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sortino for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SORTINO['6-month'],
|
|
decimal=3)
|
|
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.sortino for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_SORTINO['year'],
|
|
decimal=3)
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_information_06(self):
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.information, 3)
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
[0.131,
|
|
-0.11,
|
|
-0.067,
|
|
0.136,
|
|
0.301,
|
|
-0.387,
|
|
0.107,
|
|
-0.032,
|
|
-0.058,
|
|
0.069,
|
|
0.095,
|
|
-0.123])
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.information, 3)
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
[-0.013,
|
|
-0.009,
|
|
0.111,
|
|
-0.014,
|
|
-0.017,
|
|
-0.108,
|
|
0.011,
|
|
-0.004,
|
|
0.032,
|
|
0.011])
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.information, 3)
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
[-0.013,
|
|
-0.014,
|
|
-0.003,
|
|
-0.002,
|
|
-0.011,
|
|
-0.041,
|
|
0.011])
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.information, 3)
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
[-0.001])
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_beta_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.beta for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BETA['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.beta for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BETA['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.beta for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BETA['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.beta for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BETA['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_algorithm_alpha_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.alpha for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_ALPHA['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.alpha for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_ALPHA['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.alpha for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_ALPHA['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.alpha for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_ALPHA['year'])
|
|
|
|
# FIXME: Covariance is not matching excel precisely enough to run the test.
|
|
# Month 4 seems to be the problem. Variance is disabled
|
|
# just to avoid distraction - it is much closer than covariance
|
|
# and can probably pass with 6 significant digits instead of 7.
|
|
# re-enable variance, alpha, and beta tests once this is resolved
|
|
def test_algorithm_covariance_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_covariance for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_COVARIANCE['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_covariance
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_COVARIANCE['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_covariance
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_COVARIANCE['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.algorithm_covariance
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_COVARIANCE['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_benchmark_variance_06(self):
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_variance
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BENCHMARK_VARIANCE['Monthly'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_variance
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.three_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BENCHMARK_VARIANCE['3-Month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_variance
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.six_month_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BENCHMARK_VARIANCE['6-month'])
|
|
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(
|
|
[x.benchmark_variance
|
|
for x in self.metrics_06.year_periods],
|
|
ANSWER_KEY.ALGORITHM_PERIOD_BENCHMARK_VARIANCE['year'])
|
|
|
|
def test_benchmark_returns_08(self):
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_range(self.sim_params08)
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskReport(returns, self.sim_params08)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_period_returns, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.month_periods],
|
|
[-0.061,
|
|
-0.035,
|
|
-0.006,
|
|
0.048,
|
|
0.011,
|
|
-0.086,
|
|
-0.01,
|
|
0.012,
|
|
-0.091,
|
|
-0.169,
|
|
-0.075,
|
|
0.008])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_period_returns, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.three_month_periods],
|
|
[-0.099,
|
|
0.005,
|
|
0.052,
|
|
-0.032,
|
|
-0.085,
|
|
-0.084,
|
|
-0.089,
|
|
-0.236,
|
|
-0.301,
|
|
-0.226])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_period_returns, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.six_month_periods],
|
|
[-0.128,
|
|
-0.081,
|
|
-0.036,
|
|
-0.118,
|
|
-0.301,
|
|
-0.36,
|
|
-0.294])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_period_returns, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.year_periods],
|
|
[-0.385])
|
|
|
|
def test_trading_days_08(self):
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_range(self.sim_params08)
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskReport(returns, self.sim_params08)
|
|
self.assertEqual([x.num_trading_days for x in metrics.year_periods],
|
|
[253])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([x.num_trading_days for x in metrics.month_periods],
|
|
[21, 20, 20, 22, 21, 21, 22, 21, 21, 23, 19, 22])
|
|
|
|
def test_benchmark_volatility_08(self):
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_range(self.sim_params08)
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskReport(returns, self.sim_params08)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_volatility, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.month_periods],
|
|
[0.07,
|
|
0.058,
|
|
0.082,
|
|
0.054,
|
|
0.041,
|
|
0.057,
|
|
0.068,
|
|
0.06,
|
|
0.157,
|
|
0.244,
|
|
0.195,
|
|
0.145])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_volatility, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.three_month_periods],
|
|
[0.12,
|
|
0.113,
|
|
0.105,
|
|
0.09,
|
|
0.098,
|
|
0.107,
|
|
0.179,
|
|
0.293,
|
|
0.344,
|
|
0.34])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_volatility, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.six_month_periods],
|
|
[0.15,
|
|
0.149,
|
|
0.15,
|
|
0.2,
|
|
0.308,
|
|
0.36,
|
|
0.383])
|
|
# TODO: ugly, but I can't get the rounded float to match.
|
|
# maybe we need a different test that checks the
|
|
# difference between the numbers
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.benchmark_volatility, 3)
|
|
for x in metrics.year_periods],
|
|
[0.411])
|
|
|
|
def test_treasury_returns_06(self):
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_range(self.sim_params)
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskReport(returns, self.sim_params)
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.treasury_period_return, 4)
|
|
for x in metrics.month_periods],
|
|
[0.0037,
|
|
0.0034,
|
|
0.0039,
|
|
0.0038,
|
|
0.0040,
|
|
0.0037,
|
|
0.0043,
|
|
0.0043,
|
|
0.0038,
|
|
0.0044,
|
|
0.0043,
|
|
0.004])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.treasury_period_return, 4)
|
|
for x in metrics.three_month_periods],
|
|
[0.0114,
|
|
0.0116,
|
|
0.0122,
|
|
0.0125,
|
|
0.0129,
|
|
0.0127,
|
|
0.0123,
|
|
0.0128,
|
|
0.0125,
|
|
0.0127])
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.treasury_period_return, 4)
|
|
for x in metrics.six_month_periods],
|
|
[0.0260,
|
|
0.0257,
|
|
0.0258,
|
|
0.0252,
|
|
0.0259,
|
|
0.0256,
|
|
0.0257])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual([round(x.treasury_period_return, 4)
|
|
for x in metrics.year_periods],
|
|
[0.0500])
|
|
|
|
def test_benchmarkrange(self):
|
|
self.check_year_range(
|
|
datetime.datetime(
|
|
year=2008, month=1, day=1, tzinfo=pytz.utc),
|
|
2)
|
|
|
|
def test_partial_month(self):
|
|
|
|
start = datetime.datetime(
|
|
year=1991,
|
|
month=1,
|
|
day=1,
|
|
hour=0,
|
|
minute=0,
|
|
tzinfo=pytz.utc)
|
|
|
|
# 1992 and 1996 were leap years
|
|
total_days = 365 * 5 + 2
|
|
end = start + datetime.timedelta(days=total_days)
|
|
sim_params90s = SimulationParameters(
|
|
period_start=start,
|
|
period_end=end
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_range(sim_params90s)
|
|
returns = returns[:-10] # truncate the returns series to end mid-month
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskReport(returns, sim_params90s)
|
|
total_months = 60
|
|
self.check_metrics(metrics, total_months, start)
|
|
|
|
def check_year_range(self, start_date, years):
|
|
sim_params = SimulationParameters(
|
|
period_start=start_date,
|
|
period_end=start_date.replace(year=(start_date.year + years))
|
|
)
|
|
returns = factory.create_returns_from_range(sim_params)
|
|
metrics = risk.RiskReport(returns, self.sim_params)
|
|
total_months = years * 12
|
|
self.check_metrics(metrics, total_months, start_date)
|
|
|
|
def check_metrics(self, metrics, total_months, start_date):
|
|
"""
|
|
confirm that the right number of riskmetrics were calculated for each
|
|
window length.
|
|
"""
|
|
self.assert_range_length(
|
|
metrics.month_periods,
|
|
total_months,
|
|
1,
|
|
start_date
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_range_length(
|
|
metrics.three_month_periods,
|
|
total_months,
|
|
3,
|
|
start_date
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_range_length(
|
|
metrics.six_month_periods,
|
|
total_months,
|
|
6,
|
|
start_date
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assert_range_length(
|
|
metrics.year_periods,
|
|
total_months,
|
|
12,
|
|
start_date
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def assert_last_day(self, period_end):
|
|
# 30 days has september, april, june and november
|
|
if period_end.month in [9, 4, 6, 11]:
|
|
self.assertEqual(period_end.day, 30)
|
|
# all the rest have 31, except for february
|
|
elif(period_end.month != 2):
|
|
self.assertEqual(period_end.day, 31)
|
|
else:
|
|
if calendar.isleap(period_end.year):
|
|
self.assertEqual(period_end.day, 29)
|
|
else:
|
|
self.assertEqual(period_end.day, 28)
|
|
|
|
def assert_month(self, start_month, actual_end_month):
|
|
if start_month == 1:
|
|
expected_end_month = 12
|
|
else:
|
|
expected_end_month = start_month - 1
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(expected_end_month, actual_end_month)
|
|
|
|
def assert_range_length(self, col, total_months,
|
|
period_length, start_date):
|
|
if(period_length > total_months):
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(col), 0)
|
|
else:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
len(col),
|
|
total_months - (period_length - 1),
|
|
"mismatch for total months - \
|
|
expected:{total_months}/actual:{actual}, \
|
|
period:{period_length}, start:{start_date}, \
|
|
calculated end:{end}".format(total_months=total_months,
|
|
period_length=period_length,
|
|
start_date=start_date,
|
|
end=col[-1].end_date,
|
|
actual=len(col))
|
|
)
|
|
self.assert_month(start_date.month, col[-1].end_date.month)
|
|
self.assert_last_day(col[-1].end_date)
|