mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/catalyst.git
synced 2026-07-01 00:50:45 +08:00
e934c6aeaf
When adding fixtures for futures data, there will be a need for multiple calendars in the fixture ecosystem. e.g. a test that includes both equities and futures would need an overall calendar which encompasses both equities and futures; however, the test data for equities should still still be limited to the bounds set by the NYSE calendar. Make the fixtures that setup trading calendars and values dervied from the trading calendar (e.g. trading sessions) accept an iterable of calendars which need to be created, then populate those values into a dict keyed by the calendar name. Change `WithNYSETradingDays` to include sessions in the name, since we are moving to session as the name for the 'day' unit. Provide `trading_days` which is really "NYSE trading sessions` on `WithTradingSessions` for backwards compatibility.
1463 lines
53 KiB
Python
1463 lines
53 KiB
Python
#
|
|
# Copyright 2015 Quantopian, Inc.
|
|
#
|
|
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
#
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
#
|
|
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
# limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests for the zipline.assets package
|
|
"""
|
|
from contextlib import contextmanager
|
|
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
|
|
from functools import partial
|
|
import pickle
|
|
import sys
|
|
from types import GetSetDescriptorType
|
|
from unittest import TestCase
|
|
import uuid
|
|
import warnings
|
|
|
|
from nose_parameterized import parameterized
|
|
from numpy import full, int32, int64
|
|
import pandas as pd
|
|
from pandas.util.testing import assert_frame_equal
|
|
from six import PY2, viewkeys
|
|
import sqlalchemy as sa
|
|
|
|
from zipline.assets import (
|
|
Asset,
|
|
Equity,
|
|
Future,
|
|
AssetDBWriter,
|
|
AssetFinder,
|
|
)
|
|
from zipline.assets.synthetic import (
|
|
make_commodity_future_info,
|
|
make_rotating_equity_info,
|
|
make_simple_equity_info,
|
|
)
|
|
from six import itervalues, integer_types
|
|
from toolz import valmap
|
|
|
|
from zipline.assets.futures import (
|
|
cme_code_to_month,
|
|
FutureChain,
|
|
month_to_cme_code
|
|
)
|
|
from zipline.assets.asset_writer import (
|
|
check_version_info,
|
|
write_version_info,
|
|
_futures_defaults,
|
|
SQLITE_MAX_VARIABLE_NUMBER,
|
|
)
|
|
from zipline.assets.asset_db_schema import ASSET_DB_VERSION
|
|
from zipline.assets.asset_db_migrations import (
|
|
downgrade
|
|
)
|
|
from zipline.errors import (
|
|
EquitiesNotFound,
|
|
FutureContractsNotFound,
|
|
MultipleSymbolsFound,
|
|
RootSymbolNotFound,
|
|
AssetDBVersionError,
|
|
SidsNotFound,
|
|
SymbolNotFound,
|
|
AssetDBImpossibleDowngrade,
|
|
)
|
|
from zipline.testing import (
|
|
all_subindices,
|
|
empty_assets_db,
|
|
tmp_assets_db,
|
|
)
|
|
from zipline.testing.predicates import assert_equal
|
|
from zipline.testing.fixtures import (
|
|
WithAssetFinder,
|
|
ZiplineTestCase,
|
|
WithTradingCalendars,
|
|
)
|
|
from zipline.utils.range import range
|
|
|
|
|
|
@contextmanager
|
|
def build_lookup_generic_cases(asset_finder_type):
|
|
"""
|
|
Generate test cases for the type of asset finder specific by
|
|
asset_finder_type for test_lookup_generic.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
unique_start = pd.Timestamp('2013-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
unique_end = pd.Timestamp('2014-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
|
|
dupe_0_start = pd.Timestamp('2013-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
dupe_0_end = dupe_0_start + timedelta(days=1)
|
|
|
|
dupe_1_start = pd.Timestamp('2013-01-03', tz='UTC')
|
|
dupe_1_end = dupe_1_start + timedelta(days=1)
|
|
|
|
frame = pd.DataFrame.from_records(
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 0,
|
|
'symbol': 'duplicated',
|
|
'start_date': dupe_0_start.value,
|
|
'end_date': dupe_0_end.value,
|
|
'exchange': 'TEST',
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 1,
|
|
'symbol': 'duplicated',
|
|
'start_date': dupe_1_start.value,
|
|
'end_date': dupe_1_end.value,
|
|
'exchange': 'TEST',
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 2,
|
|
'symbol': 'unique',
|
|
'start_date': unique_start.value,
|
|
'end_date': unique_end.value,
|
|
'exchange': 'TEST',
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
index='sid')
|
|
with tmp_assets_db(equities=frame) as assets_db:
|
|
finder = asset_finder_type(assets_db)
|
|
dupe_0, dupe_1, unique = assets = [
|
|
finder.retrieve_asset(i)
|
|
for i in range(3)
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
dupe_0_start = dupe_0.start_date
|
|
dupe_1_start = dupe_1.start_date
|
|
yield (
|
|
##
|
|
# Scalars
|
|
|
|
# Asset object
|
|
(finder, assets[0], None, assets[0]),
|
|
(finder, assets[1], None, assets[1]),
|
|
(finder, assets[2], None, assets[2]),
|
|
# int
|
|
(finder, 0, None, assets[0]),
|
|
(finder, 1, None, assets[1]),
|
|
(finder, 2, None, assets[2]),
|
|
# Duplicated symbol with resolution date
|
|
(finder, 'DUPLICATED', dupe_0_start, dupe_0),
|
|
(finder, 'DUPLICATED', dupe_1_start, dupe_1),
|
|
# Unique symbol, with or without resolution date.
|
|
(finder, 'UNIQUE', unique_start, unique),
|
|
(finder, 'UNIQUE', None, unique),
|
|
|
|
##
|
|
# Iterables
|
|
|
|
# Iterables of Asset objects.
|
|
(finder, assets, None, assets),
|
|
(finder, iter(assets), None, assets),
|
|
# Iterables of ints
|
|
(finder, (0, 1), None, assets[:-1]),
|
|
(finder, iter((0, 1)), None, assets[:-1]),
|
|
# Iterables of symbols.
|
|
(finder, ('DUPLICATED', 'UNIQUE'), dupe_0_start, [dupe_0, unique]),
|
|
(finder, ('DUPLICATED', 'UNIQUE'), dupe_1_start, [dupe_1, unique]),
|
|
# Mixed types
|
|
(finder,
|
|
('DUPLICATED', 2, 'UNIQUE', 1, dupe_1),
|
|
dupe_0_start,
|
|
[dupe_0, assets[2], unique, assets[1], dupe_1]),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AssetTestCase(TestCase):
|
|
|
|
# Dynamically list the Asset properties we want to test.
|
|
asset_attrs = [name for name, value in vars(Asset).items()
|
|
if isinstance(value, GetSetDescriptorType)]
|
|
|
|
# Very wow
|
|
asset = Asset(
|
|
1337,
|
|
symbol="DOGE",
|
|
asset_name="DOGECOIN",
|
|
start_date=pd.Timestamp('2013-12-08 9:31AM', tz='UTC'),
|
|
end_date=pd.Timestamp('2014-06-25 11:21AM', tz='UTC'),
|
|
first_traded=pd.Timestamp('2013-12-08 9:31AM', tz='UTC'),
|
|
auto_close_date=pd.Timestamp('2014-06-26 11:21AM', tz='UTC'),
|
|
exchange='THE MOON',
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
asset3 = Asset(3, exchange="test")
|
|
asset4 = Asset(4, exchange="test")
|
|
asset5 = Asset(5, exchange="still testing")
|
|
|
|
def test_asset_object(self):
|
|
the_asset = Asset(5061, exchange="bar")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEquals({5061: 'foo'}[the_asset], 'foo')
|
|
self.assertEquals(the_asset, 5061)
|
|
self.assertEquals(5061, the_asset)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEquals(the_asset, the_asset)
|
|
self.assertEquals(int(the_asset), 5061)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEquals(str(the_asset), 'Asset(5061)')
|
|
|
|
def test_to_and_from_dict(self):
|
|
asset_from_dict = Asset.from_dict(self.asset.to_dict())
|
|
for attr in self.asset_attrs:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
getattr(self.asset, attr), getattr(asset_from_dict, attr),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_asset_is_pickleable(self):
|
|
asset_unpickled = pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(self.asset))
|
|
for attr in self.asset_attrs:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
getattr(self.asset, attr), getattr(asset_unpickled, attr),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_asset_comparisons(self):
|
|
|
|
s_23 = Asset(23, exchange="test")
|
|
s_24 = Asset(24, exchange="test")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(s_23, s_23)
|
|
self.assertEqual(s_23, 23)
|
|
self.assertEqual(23, s_23)
|
|
self.assertEqual(int32(23), s_23)
|
|
self.assertEqual(int64(23), s_23)
|
|
self.assertEqual(s_23, int32(23))
|
|
self.assertEqual(s_23, int64(23))
|
|
# Check all int types (includes long on py2):
|
|
for int_type in integer_types:
|
|
self.assertEqual(int_type(23), s_23)
|
|
self.assertEqual(s_23, int_type(23))
|
|
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(s_23, s_24)
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(s_23, 24)
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(s_23, "23")
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(s_23, 23.5)
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(s_23, [])
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(s_23, None)
|
|
# Compare to a value that doesn't fit into a platform int:
|
|
self.assertNotEqual(s_23, sys.maxsize + 1)
|
|
|
|
self.assertLess(s_23, s_24)
|
|
self.assertLess(s_23, 24)
|
|
self.assertGreater(24, s_23)
|
|
self.assertGreater(s_24, s_23)
|
|
|
|
def test_lt(self):
|
|
self.assertTrue(self.asset3 < self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset4 < self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset5 < self.asset4)
|
|
|
|
def test_le(self):
|
|
self.assertTrue(self.asset3 <= self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertTrue(self.asset4 <= self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset5 <= self.asset4)
|
|
|
|
def test_eq(self):
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset3 == self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertTrue(self.asset4 == self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset5 == self.asset4)
|
|
|
|
def test_ge(self):
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset3 >= self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertTrue(self.asset4 >= self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertTrue(self.asset5 >= self.asset4)
|
|
|
|
def test_gt(self):
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset3 > self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertFalse(self.asset4 > self.asset4)
|
|
self.assertTrue(self.asset5 > self.asset4)
|
|
|
|
def test_type_mismatch(self):
|
|
if sys.version_info.major < 3:
|
|
self.assertIsNotNone(self.asset3 < 'a')
|
|
self.assertIsNotNone('a' < self.asset3)
|
|
else:
|
|
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
|
|
self.asset3 < 'a'
|
|
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
|
|
'a' < self.asset3
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestFuture(WithAssetFinder, ZiplineTestCase):
|
|
@classmethod
|
|
def make_futures_info(cls):
|
|
return pd.DataFrame.from_dict(
|
|
{
|
|
2468: {
|
|
'symbol': 'OMH15',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'OM',
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2014-01-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2014-02-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'auto_close_date': pd.Timestamp('2014-01-18', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'tick_size': .01,
|
|
'multiplier': 500.0,
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
0: {
|
|
'symbol': 'CLG06',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'CL',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2005-12-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2005-12-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-01-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'multiplier': 1.0,
|
|
'exchange': 'TEST',
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
orient='index',
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@classmethod
|
|
def init_class_fixtures(cls):
|
|
super(TestFuture, cls).init_class_fixtures()
|
|
cls.future = cls.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('OMH15')
|
|
cls.future2 = cls.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('CLG06')
|
|
|
|
def test_str(self):
|
|
strd = str(self.future)
|
|
self.assertEqual("Future(2468 [OMH15])", strd)
|
|
|
|
def test_repr(self):
|
|
reprd = repr(self.future)
|
|
self.assertIn("Future", reprd)
|
|
self.assertIn("2468", reprd)
|
|
self.assertIn("OMH15", reprd)
|
|
self.assertIn("root_symbol=%s'OM'" % ('u' if PY2 else ''), reprd)
|
|
self.assertIn(
|
|
"notice_date=Timestamp('2014-01-20 00:00:00+0000', tz='UTC')",
|
|
reprd,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertIn(
|
|
"expiration_date=Timestamp('2014-02-20 00:00:00+0000'",
|
|
reprd,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertIn(
|
|
"auto_close_date=Timestamp('2014-01-18 00:00:00+0000'",
|
|
reprd,
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertIn("tick_size=0.01", reprd)
|
|
self.assertIn("multiplier=500", reprd)
|
|
|
|
def test_reduce(self):
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(self.future)).to_dict(),
|
|
self.future.to_dict(),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_to_and_from_dict(self):
|
|
dictd = self.future.to_dict()
|
|
for field in _futures_defaults.keys():
|
|
self.assertTrue(field in dictd)
|
|
|
|
from_dict = Future.from_dict(dictd)
|
|
self.assertTrue(isinstance(from_dict, Future))
|
|
self.assertEqual(self.future, from_dict)
|
|
|
|
def test_root_symbol(self):
|
|
self.assertEqual('OM', self.future.root_symbol)
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_future_symbol(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Test the lookup_future_symbol method.
|
|
"""
|
|
om = TestFuture.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('OMH15')
|
|
self.assertEqual(om.sid, 2468)
|
|
self.assertEqual(om.symbol, 'OMH15')
|
|
self.assertEqual(om.root_symbol, 'OM')
|
|
self.assertEqual(om.notice_date, pd.Timestamp('2014-01-20', tz='UTC'))
|
|
self.assertEqual(om.expiration_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp('2014-02-20', tz='UTC'))
|
|
self.assertEqual(om.auto_close_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp('2014-01-18', tz='UTC'))
|
|
|
|
cl = TestFuture.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('CLG06')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl.sid, 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl.symbol, 'CLG06')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl.root_symbol, 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl.start_date, pd.Timestamp('2005-12-01', tz='UTC'))
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl.notice_date, pd.Timestamp('2005-12-20', tz='UTC'))
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl.expiration_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp('2006-01-20', tz='UTC'))
|
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
TestFuture.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('')
|
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
TestFuture.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('#&?!')
|
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
TestFuture.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('FOOBAR')
|
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
TestFuture.asset_finder.lookup_future_symbol('XXX99')
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AssetFinderTestCase(WithTradingCalendars, ZiplineTestCase):
|
|
asset_finder_type = AssetFinder
|
|
|
|
def write_assets(self, **kwargs):
|
|
self._asset_writer.write(**kwargs)
|
|
|
|
def init_instance_fixtures(self):
|
|
super(AssetFinderTestCase, self).init_instance_fixtures()
|
|
|
|
conn = self.enter_instance_context(empty_assets_db())
|
|
self._asset_writer = AssetDBWriter(conn)
|
|
self.asset_finder = self.asset_finder_type(conn)
|
|
|
|
def test_blocked_lookup_symbol_query(self):
|
|
# we will try to query for more variables than sqlite supports
|
|
# to make sure we are properly chunking on the client side
|
|
as_of = pd.Timestamp('2013-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
# we need more sids than we can query from sqlite
|
|
nsids = SQLITE_MAX_VARIABLE_NUMBER + 10
|
|
sids = range(nsids)
|
|
frame = pd.DataFrame.from_records(
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': sid,
|
|
'symbol': 'TEST.%d' % sid,
|
|
'start_date': as_of.value,
|
|
'end_date': as_of.value,
|
|
'exchange': uuid.uuid4().hex
|
|
}
|
|
for sid in sids
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=frame)
|
|
assets = self.asset_finder.retrieve_equities(sids)
|
|
assert_equal(viewkeys(assets), set(sids))
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_symbol_delimited(self):
|
|
as_of = pd.Timestamp('2013-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
frame = pd.DataFrame.from_records(
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': i,
|
|
'symbol': 'TEST.%d' % i,
|
|
'company_name': "company%d" % i,
|
|
'start_date': as_of.value,
|
|
'end_date': as_of.value,
|
|
'exchange': uuid.uuid4().hex
|
|
}
|
|
for i in range(3)
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=frame)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
asset_0, asset_1, asset_2 = (
|
|
finder.retrieve_asset(i) for i in range(3)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# we do it twice to catch caching bugs
|
|
for i in range(2):
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('TEST', as_of)
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('TEST1', as_of)
|
|
# '@' is not a supported delimiter
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('TEST@1', as_of)
|
|
|
|
# Adding an unnecessary fuzzy shouldn't matter.
|
|
for fuzzy_char in ['-', '/', '_', '.']:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
asset_1,
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('TEST%s1' % fuzzy_char, as_of)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_symbol_fuzzy(self):
|
|
metadata = pd.DataFrame.from_records([
|
|
{'symbol': 'PRTY_HRD', 'exchange': "TEST"},
|
|
{'symbol': 'BRKA', 'exchange': "TEST"},
|
|
{'symbol': 'BRK_A', 'exchange': "TEST"},
|
|
])
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=metadata)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
dt = pd.Timestamp('2013-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
|
|
# Try combos of looking up PRTYHRD with and without a time or fuzzy
|
|
# Both non-fuzzys get no result
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('PRTYHRD', None)
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('PRTYHRD', dt)
|
|
# Both fuzzys work
|
|
self.assertEqual(0, finder.lookup_symbol('PRTYHRD', None, fuzzy=True))
|
|
self.assertEqual(0, finder.lookup_symbol('PRTYHRD', dt, fuzzy=True))
|
|
|
|
# Try combos of looking up PRTY_HRD, all returning sid 0
|
|
self.assertEqual(0, finder.lookup_symbol('PRTY_HRD', None))
|
|
self.assertEqual(0, finder.lookup_symbol('PRTY_HRD', dt))
|
|
self.assertEqual(0, finder.lookup_symbol('PRTY_HRD', None, fuzzy=True))
|
|
self.assertEqual(0, finder.lookup_symbol('PRTY_HRD', dt, fuzzy=True))
|
|
|
|
# Try combos of looking up BRKA, all returning sid 1
|
|
self.assertEqual(1, finder.lookup_symbol('BRKA', None))
|
|
self.assertEqual(1, finder.lookup_symbol('BRKA', dt))
|
|
self.assertEqual(1, finder.lookup_symbol('BRKA', None, fuzzy=True))
|
|
self.assertEqual(1, finder.lookup_symbol('BRKA', dt, fuzzy=True))
|
|
|
|
# Try combos of looking up BRK_A, all returning sid 2
|
|
self.assertEqual(2, finder.lookup_symbol('BRK_A', None))
|
|
self.assertEqual(2, finder.lookup_symbol('BRK_A', dt))
|
|
self.assertEqual(2, finder.lookup_symbol('BRK_A', None, fuzzy=True))
|
|
self.assertEqual(2, finder.lookup_symbol('BRK_A', dt, fuzzy=True))
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_symbol_change_ticker(self):
|
|
T = partial(pd.Timestamp, tz='utc')
|
|
metadata = pd.DataFrame.from_records(
|
|
[
|
|
# sid 0
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'A',
|
|
'start_date': T('2014-01-01'),
|
|
'end_date': T('2014-01-05'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'B',
|
|
'start_date': T('2014-01-06'),
|
|
'end_date': T('2014-01-10'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
# sid 1
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'C',
|
|
'start_date': T('2014-01-01'),
|
|
'end_date': T('2014-01-05'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'A', # claiming the unused symbol 'A'
|
|
'start_date': T('2014-01-06'),
|
|
'end_date': T('2014-01-10'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
index=[0, 0, 1, 1],
|
|
)
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=metadata)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
|
|
# note: these assertions walk forward in time, starting at assertions
|
|
# about ownership before the start_date and ending with assertions
|
|
# after the end_date; new assertions should be inserted in the correct
|
|
# locations
|
|
|
|
# no one held 'A' before 01
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('A', T('2013-12-31'))
|
|
|
|
# no one held 'C' before 01
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('C', T('2013-12-31'))
|
|
|
|
for asof in pd.date_range('2014-01-01', '2014-01-05', tz='utc'):
|
|
# from 01 through 05 sid 0 held 'A'
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('A', asof),
|
|
finder.retrieve_asset(0),
|
|
msg=str(asof),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# from 01 through 05 sid 1 held 'C'
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('C', asof),
|
|
finder.retrieve_asset(1),
|
|
msg=str(asof),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# no one held 'B' before 06
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('B', T('2014-01-05'))
|
|
|
|
# no one held 'C' after 06, however, no one has claimed it yet
|
|
# so it still maps to sid 1
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('C', T('2014-01-07')),
|
|
finder.retrieve_asset(1),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
for asof in pd.date_range('2014-01-06', '2014-01-11', tz='utc'):
|
|
# from 06 through 10 sid 0 held 'B'
|
|
# we test through the 11th because sid 1 is the last to hold 'B'
|
|
# so it should ffill
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('B', asof),
|
|
finder.retrieve_asset(0),
|
|
msg=str(asof),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# from 06 through 10 sid 1 held 'A'
|
|
# we test through the 11th because sid 1 is the last to hold 'A'
|
|
# so it should ffill
|
|
assert_equal(
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('A', asof),
|
|
finder.retrieve_asset(1),
|
|
msg=str(asof),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_symbol(self):
|
|
|
|
# Incrementing by two so that start and end dates for each
|
|
# generated Asset don't overlap (each Asset's end_date is the
|
|
# day after its start date.)
|
|
dates = pd.date_range('2013-01-01', freq='2D', periods=5, tz='UTC')
|
|
df = pd.DataFrame.from_records(
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': i,
|
|
'symbol': 'existing',
|
|
'start_date': date.value,
|
|
'end_date': (date + timedelta(days=1)).value,
|
|
'exchange': 'NYSE',
|
|
}
|
|
for i, date in enumerate(dates)
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=df)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
for _ in range(2): # Run checks twice to test for caching bugs.
|
|
with self.assertRaises(SymbolNotFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('NON_EXISTING', dates[0])
|
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(MultipleSymbolsFound):
|
|
finder.lookup_symbol('EXISTING', None)
|
|
|
|
for i, date in enumerate(dates):
|
|
# Verify that we correctly resolve multiple symbols using
|
|
# the supplied date
|
|
result = finder.lookup_symbol('EXISTING', date)
|
|
self.assertEqual(result.symbol, 'EXISTING')
|
|
self.assertEqual(result.sid, i)
|
|
|
|
def test_fail_to_write_overlapping_data(self):
|
|
df = pd.DataFrame.from_records(
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 1,
|
|
'symbol': 'multiple',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2010-01-01'),
|
|
'end_date': pd.Timestamp('2012-01-01'),
|
|
'exchange': 'NYSE'
|
|
},
|
|
# Same as asset 1, but with a later end date.
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 2,
|
|
'symbol': 'multiple',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2010-01-01'),
|
|
'end_date': pd.Timestamp('2013-01-01'),
|
|
'exchange': 'NYSE'
|
|
},
|
|
# Same as asset 1, but with a later start_date
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 3,
|
|
'symbol': 'multiple',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2011-01-01'),
|
|
'end_date': pd.Timestamp('2012-01-01'),
|
|
'exchange': 'NYSE'
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as e:
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=df)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
str(e.exception),
|
|
"Ambiguous ownership for 1 symbol, multiple assets held the"
|
|
" following symbols:\n"
|
|
"MULTIPLE:\n"
|
|
" intersections: (('2010-01-01 00:00:00', '2012-01-01 00:00:00'),"
|
|
" ('2011-01-01 00:00:00', '2012-01-01 00:00:00'))\n"
|
|
" start_date end_date\n"
|
|
" sid \n"
|
|
" 1 2010-01-01 2012-01-01\n"
|
|
" 2 2010-01-01 2013-01-01\n"
|
|
" 3 2011-01-01 2012-01-01"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_generic(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Ensure that lookup_generic works with various permutations of inputs.
|
|
"""
|
|
with build_lookup_generic_cases(self.asset_finder_type) as cases:
|
|
for finder, symbols, reference_date, expected in cases:
|
|
results, missing = finder.lookup_generic(symbols,
|
|
reference_date)
|
|
self.assertEqual(results, expected)
|
|
self.assertEqual(missing, [])
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_generic_handle_missing(self):
|
|
data = pd.DataFrame.from_records(
|
|
[
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 0,
|
|
'symbol': 'real',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2013-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'end_date': pd.Timestamp('2014-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': 'TEST',
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 1,
|
|
'symbol': 'also_real',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2013-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'end_date': pd.Timestamp('2014-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': 'TEST',
|
|
},
|
|
# Sid whose end date is before our query date. We should
|
|
# still correctly find it.
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 2,
|
|
'symbol': 'real_but_old',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2002-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'end_date': pd.Timestamp('2003-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': 'TEST',
|
|
},
|
|
# Sid whose start_date is **after** our query date. We should
|
|
# **not** find it.
|
|
{
|
|
'sid': 3,
|
|
'symbol': 'real_but_in_the_future',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2014-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'end_date': pd.Timestamp('2020-1-1', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': 'THE FUTURE',
|
|
},
|
|
]
|
|
)
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=data)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
results, missing = finder.lookup_generic(
|
|
['REAL', 1, 'FAKE', 'REAL_BUT_OLD', 'REAL_BUT_IN_THE_FUTURE'],
|
|
pd.Timestamp('2013-02-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(results), 3)
|
|
self.assertEqual(results[0].symbol, 'REAL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(results[0].sid, 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(results[1].symbol, 'ALSO_REAL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(results[1].sid, 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(results[2].symbol, 'REAL_BUT_OLD')
|
|
self.assertEqual(results[2].sid, 2)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(missing), 2)
|
|
self.assertEqual(missing[0], 'FAKE')
|
|
self.assertEqual(missing[1], 'REAL_BUT_IN_THE_FUTURE')
|
|
|
|
def test_security_dates_warning(self):
|
|
|
|
# Build an asset with an end_date
|
|
eq_end = pd.Timestamp('2012-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
equity_asset = Equity(1, symbol="TESTEQ", end_date=eq_end,
|
|
exchange="TEST")
|
|
|
|
# Catch all warnings
|
|
with warnings.catch_warnings(record=True) as w:
|
|
# Cause all warnings to always be triggered
|
|
warnings.simplefilter("always")
|
|
equity_asset.security_start_date
|
|
equity_asset.security_end_date
|
|
equity_asset.security_name
|
|
# Verify the warning
|
|
self.assertEqual(3, len(w))
|
|
for warning in w:
|
|
self.assertTrue(issubclass(warning.category,
|
|
DeprecationWarning))
|
|
|
|
def test_lookup_future_chain(self):
|
|
metadata = pd.DataFrame.from_records([
|
|
# Notice day is today, so should be valid.
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'ADN15',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'AD',
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-06-14', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-08-14', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-01-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'ADV15',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'AD',
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-05-14', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-09-14', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-01-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
# Starts trading today, so should be valid.
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'ADF16',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'AD',
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-11-16', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-12-16', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-05-14', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
# Starts trading in August, so not valid.
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'ADX16',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'AD',
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-11-16', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-12-16', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-08-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
# Notice date comes after expiration
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'ADZ16',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'AD',
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2016-11-25', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2016-11-16', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2015-08-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
# This contract has no start date and also this contract should be
|
|
# last in all chains
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'ADZ20',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'AD',
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2020-11-25', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2020-11-16', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
])
|
|
self.write_assets(futures=metadata)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
dt = pd.Timestamp('2015-05-14', tz='UTC')
|
|
dt_2 = pd.Timestamp('2015-10-14', tz='UTC')
|
|
dt_3 = pd.Timestamp('2016-11-17', tz='UTC')
|
|
|
|
# Check that we get the expected number of contracts, in the
|
|
# right order
|
|
ad_contracts = finder.lookup_future_chain('AD', dt)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(ad_contracts), 6)
|
|
self.assertEqual(ad_contracts[0].sid, 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(ad_contracts[1].sid, 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(ad_contracts[5].sid, 5)
|
|
|
|
# Check that, when some contracts have expired, the chain has advanced
|
|
# properly to the next contracts
|
|
ad_contracts = finder.lookup_future_chain('AD', dt_2)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(ad_contracts), 4)
|
|
self.assertEqual(ad_contracts[0].sid, 2)
|
|
self.assertEqual(ad_contracts[3].sid, 5)
|
|
|
|
# Check that when the expiration_date has passed but the
|
|
# notice_date hasn't, contract is still considered invalid.
|
|
ad_contracts = finder.lookup_future_chain('AD', dt_3)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(ad_contracts), 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(ad_contracts[0].sid, 5)
|
|
|
|
# Check that pd.NaT for as_of_date gives the whole chain
|
|
ad_contracts = finder.lookup_future_chain('AD', pd.NaT)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(ad_contracts), 6)
|
|
self.assertEqual(ad_contracts[5].sid, 5)
|
|
|
|
def test_map_identifier_index_to_sids(self):
|
|
# Build an empty finder and some Assets
|
|
dt = pd.Timestamp('2014-01-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
asset1 = Equity(1, symbol="AAPL", exchange="TEST")
|
|
asset2 = Equity(2, symbol="GOOG", exchange="TEST")
|
|
asset200 = Future(200, symbol="CLK15", exchange="TEST")
|
|
asset201 = Future(201, symbol="CLM15", exchange="TEST")
|
|
|
|
# Check for correct mapping and types
|
|
pre_map = [asset1, asset2, asset200, asset201]
|
|
post_map = finder.map_identifier_index_to_sids(pre_map, dt)
|
|
self.assertListEqual([1, 2, 200, 201], post_map)
|
|
for sid in post_map:
|
|
self.assertIsInstance(sid, int)
|
|
|
|
# Change order and check mapping again
|
|
pre_map = [asset201, asset2, asset200, asset1]
|
|
post_map = finder.map_identifier_index_to_sids(pre_map, dt)
|
|
self.assertListEqual([201, 2, 200, 1], post_map)
|
|
|
|
def test_compute_lifetimes(self):
|
|
num_assets = 4
|
|
trading_day = self.trading_calendar.day
|
|
first_start = pd.Timestamp('2015-04-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
|
|
frame = make_rotating_equity_info(
|
|
num_assets=num_assets,
|
|
first_start=first_start,
|
|
frequency=trading_day,
|
|
periods_between_starts=3,
|
|
asset_lifetime=5
|
|
)
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=frame)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
|
|
all_dates = pd.date_range(
|
|
start=first_start,
|
|
end=frame.end_date.max(),
|
|
freq=trading_day,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
for dates in all_subindices(all_dates):
|
|
expected_with_start_raw = full(
|
|
shape=(len(dates), num_assets),
|
|
fill_value=False,
|
|
dtype=bool,
|
|
)
|
|
expected_no_start_raw = full(
|
|
shape=(len(dates), num_assets),
|
|
fill_value=False,
|
|
dtype=bool,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
for i, date in enumerate(dates):
|
|
it = frame[['start_date', 'end_date']].itertuples()
|
|
for j, start, end in it:
|
|
# This way of doing the checks is redundant, but very
|
|
# clear.
|
|
if start <= date <= end:
|
|
expected_with_start_raw[i, j] = True
|
|
if start < date:
|
|
expected_no_start_raw[i, j] = True
|
|
|
|
expected_with_start = pd.DataFrame(
|
|
data=expected_with_start_raw,
|
|
index=dates,
|
|
columns=frame.index.values,
|
|
)
|
|
result = finder.lifetimes(dates, include_start_date=True)
|
|
assert_frame_equal(result, expected_with_start)
|
|
|
|
expected_no_start = pd.DataFrame(
|
|
data=expected_no_start_raw,
|
|
index=dates,
|
|
columns=frame.index.values,
|
|
)
|
|
result = finder.lifetimes(dates, include_start_date=False)
|
|
assert_frame_equal(result, expected_no_start)
|
|
|
|
def test_sids(self):
|
|
# Ensure that the sids property of the AssetFinder is functioning
|
|
self.write_assets(equities=make_simple_equity_info(
|
|
[0, 1, 2],
|
|
pd.Timestamp('2014-01-01'),
|
|
pd.Timestamp('2014-01-02'),
|
|
))
|
|
self.assertEqual({0, 1, 2}, set(self.asset_finder.sids))
|
|
|
|
def test_group_by_type(self):
|
|
equities = make_simple_equity_info(
|
|
range(5),
|
|
start_date=pd.Timestamp('2014-01-01'),
|
|
end_date=pd.Timestamp('2015-01-01'),
|
|
)
|
|
futures = make_commodity_future_info(
|
|
first_sid=6,
|
|
root_symbols=['CL'],
|
|
years=[2014],
|
|
)
|
|
# Intersecting sid queries, to exercise loading of partially-cached
|
|
# results.
|
|
queries = [
|
|
([0, 1, 3], [6, 7]),
|
|
([0, 2, 3], [7, 10]),
|
|
(list(equities.index), list(futures.index)),
|
|
]
|
|
self.write_assets(
|
|
equities=equities,
|
|
futures=futures,
|
|
)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
for equity_sids, future_sids in queries:
|
|
results = finder.group_by_type(equity_sids + future_sids)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
results,
|
|
{'equity': set(equity_sids), 'future': set(future_sids)},
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand([
|
|
(Equity, 'retrieve_equities', EquitiesNotFound),
|
|
(Future, 'retrieve_futures_contracts', FutureContractsNotFound),
|
|
])
|
|
def test_retrieve_specific_type(self, type_, lookup_name, failure_type):
|
|
equities = make_simple_equity_info(
|
|
range(5),
|
|
start_date=pd.Timestamp('2014-01-01'),
|
|
end_date=pd.Timestamp('2015-01-01'),
|
|
)
|
|
max_equity = equities.index.max()
|
|
futures = make_commodity_future_info(
|
|
first_sid=max_equity + 1,
|
|
root_symbols=['CL'],
|
|
years=[2014],
|
|
)
|
|
equity_sids = [0, 1]
|
|
future_sids = [max_equity + 1, max_equity + 2, max_equity + 3]
|
|
if type_ == Equity:
|
|
success_sids = equity_sids
|
|
fail_sids = future_sids
|
|
else:
|
|
fail_sids = equity_sids
|
|
success_sids = future_sids
|
|
|
|
self.write_assets(
|
|
equities=equities,
|
|
futures=futures,
|
|
)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
# Run twice to exercise caching.
|
|
lookup = getattr(finder, lookup_name)
|
|
for _ in range(2):
|
|
results = lookup(success_sids)
|
|
self.assertIsInstance(results, dict)
|
|
self.assertEqual(set(results.keys()), set(success_sids))
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
valmap(int, results),
|
|
dict(zip(success_sids, success_sids)),
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
{type_},
|
|
{type(asset) for asset in itervalues(results)},
|
|
)
|
|
with self.assertRaises(failure_type):
|
|
lookup(fail_sids)
|
|
with self.assertRaises(failure_type):
|
|
# Should fail if **any** of the assets are bad.
|
|
lookup([success_sids[0], fail_sids[0]])
|
|
|
|
def test_retrieve_all(self):
|
|
equities = make_simple_equity_info(
|
|
range(5),
|
|
start_date=pd.Timestamp('2014-01-01'),
|
|
end_date=pd.Timestamp('2015-01-01'),
|
|
)
|
|
max_equity = equities.index.max()
|
|
futures = make_commodity_future_info(
|
|
first_sid=max_equity + 1,
|
|
root_symbols=['CL'],
|
|
years=[2014],
|
|
)
|
|
self.write_assets(
|
|
equities=equities,
|
|
futures=futures,
|
|
)
|
|
finder = self.asset_finder
|
|
all_sids = finder.sids
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(all_sids), len(equities) + len(futures))
|
|
queries = [
|
|
# Empty Query.
|
|
(),
|
|
# Only Equities.
|
|
tuple(equities.index[:2]),
|
|
# Only Futures.
|
|
tuple(futures.index[:3]),
|
|
# Mixed, all cache misses.
|
|
tuple(equities.index[2:]) + tuple(futures.index[3:]),
|
|
# Mixed, all cache hits.
|
|
tuple(equities.index[2:]) + tuple(futures.index[3:]),
|
|
# Everything.
|
|
all_sids,
|
|
all_sids,
|
|
]
|
|
for sids in queries:
|
|
equity_sids = [i for i in sids if i <= max_equity]
|
|
future_sids = [i for i in sids if i > max_equity]
|
|
results = finder.retrieve_all(sids)
|
|
self.assertEqual(sids, tuple(map(int, results)))
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
[Equity for _ in equity_sids] +
|
|
[Future for _ in future_sids],
|
|
list(map(type, results)),
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
(
|
|
list(equities.symbol.loc[equity_sids]) +
|
|
list(futures.symbol.loc[future_sids])
|
|
),
|
|
list(asset.symbol for asset in results),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
@parameterized.expand([
|
|
(EquitiesNotFound, 'equity', 'equities'),
|
|
(FutureContractsNotFound, 'future contract', 'future contracts'),
|
|
(SidsNotFound, 'asset', 'assets'),
|
|
])
|
|
def test_error_message_plurality(self,
|
|
error_type,
|
|
singular,
|
|
plural):
|
|
try:
|
|
raise error_type(sids=[1])
|
|
except error_type as e:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
str(e),
|
|
"No {singular} found for sid: 1.".format(singular=singular)
|
|
)
|
|
try:
|
|
raise error_type(sids=[1, 2])
|
|
except error_type as e:
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
str(e),
|
|
"No {plural} found for sids: [1, 2].".format(plural=plural)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestFutureChain(WithAssetFinder, ZiplineTestCase):
|
|
@classmethod
|
|
def make_futures_info(cls):
|
|
return pd.DataFrame.from_records([
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'CLG06',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'CL',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2005-12-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2005-12-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-01-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'root_symbol': 'CL',
|
|
'symbol': 'CLK06',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2005-12-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-03-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-04-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'CLQ06',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'CL',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2005-12-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-06-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-07-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
'symbol': 'CLX06',
|
|
'root_symbol': 'CL',
|
|
'start_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-02-01', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'notice_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-09-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'expiration_date': pd.Timestamp('2006-10-20', tz='UTC'),
|
|
'exchange': "TEST",
|
|
}
|
|
])
|
|
|
|
def test_len(self):
|
|
""" Test the __len__ method of FutureChain.
|
|
"""
|
|
# Sids 0, 1, & 2 have started, 3 has not yet started, but all are in
|
|
# the chain
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(cl), 4)
|
|
|
|
# Sid 0 is still valid on its notice date.
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-20', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(cl), 4)
|
|
|
|
# Sid 0 is now invalid, leaving Sids 1 & 2 valid (and 3 not started).
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-21', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(cl), 3)
|
|
|
|
# Sid 3 has started, so 1, 2, & 3 are now valid.
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2006-02-01', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(cl), 3)
|
|
|
|
# All contracts are no longer valid.
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2006-09-21', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(cl), 0)
|
|
|
|
def test_getitem(self):
|
|
""" Test the __getitem__ method of FutureChain.
|
|
"""
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[0], 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[1], 1)
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[2], 2)
|
|
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-20', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[0], 0)
|
|
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-21', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[0], 1)
|
|
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2006-02-01', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[-1], 3)
|
|
|
|
def test_iter(self):
|
|
""" Test the __iter__ method of FutureChain.
|
|
"""
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL')
|
|
for i, contract in enumerate(cl):
|
|
self.assertEqual(contract, i)
|
|
|
|
# First contract is now invalid, so sids will be offset by one
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-21', 'CL')
|
|
for i, contract in enumerate(cl):
|
|
self.assertEqual(contract, i + 1)
|
|
|
|
def test_root_symbols(self):
|
|
""" Test that different variations on root symbols are handled
|
|
as expected.
|
|
"""
|
|
# Make sure this successfully gets the chain for CL.
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL')
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl.root_symbol, 'CL')
|
|
|
|
# These root symbols don't exist, so RootSymbolNotFound should
|
|
# be raised immediately.
|
|
with self.assertRaises(RootSymbolNotFound):
|
|
FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CLZ')
|
|
|
|
with self.assertRaises(RootSymbolNotFound):
|
|
FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', '')
|
|
|
|
def test_repr(self):
|
|
""" Test the __repr__ method of FutureChain.
|
|
"""
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL')
|
|
cl_feb = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL',
|
|
as_of_date=pd.Timestamp('2006-02-01', tz='UTC'))
|
|
|
|
# The default chain should not include the as of date.
|
|
self.assertEqual(repr(cl), "FutureChain(root_symbol='CL')")
|
|
|
|
# An explicit as of date should show up in the repr.
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
repr(cl_feb),
|
|
("FutureChain(root_symbol='CL', "
|
|
"as_of_date='2006-02-01 00:00:00+00:00')")
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_as_of(self):
|
|
""" Test the as_of method of FutureChain.
|
|
"""
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL')
|
|
|
|
# Test that the as_of_date is set correctly to the future
|
|
feb = pd.Timestamp('2006-02-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
cl_feb = cl.as_of(feb)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl_feb.as_of_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp(feb, tz='UTC')
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Test that the as_of_date is set correctly to the past, with
|
|
# args of str, datetime.datetime, and pd.Timestamp.
|
|
feb_prev = pd.Timestamp('2005-02-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
cl_feb_prev = cl.as_of(feb_prev)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl_feb_prev.as_of_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp(feb_prev, tz='UTC')
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
feb_prev = pd.Timestamp(datetime(year=2005, month=2, day=1), tz='UTC')
|
|
cl_feb_prev = cl.as_of(feb_prev)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl_feb_prev.as_of_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp(feb_prev, tz='UTC')
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
feb_prev = pd.Timestamp('2005-02-01', tz='UTC')
|
|
cl_feb_prev = cl.as_of(feb_prev)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl_feb_prev.as_of_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp(feb_prev, tz='UTC')
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Test that the as_of() method works with str args
|
|
feb_str = '2006-02-01'
|
|
cl_feb = cl.as_of(feb_str)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl_feb.as_of_date,
|
|
pd.Timestamp(feb, tz='UTC')
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# The chain as of the current dt should always be the same as
|
|
# the defualt chain.
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[0], cl.as_of(pd.Timestamp('2005-12-01'))[0])
|
|
|
|
def test_offset(self):
|
|
""" Test the offset method of FutureChain.
|
|
"""
|
|
cl = FutureChain(self.asset_finder, lambda: '2005-12-01', 'CL')
|
|
|
|
# Test that an offset forward sets as_of_date as expected
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl.offset('3 days').as_of_date,
|
|
cl.as_of_date + pd.Timedelta(days=3)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Test that an offset backward sets as_of_date as expected, with
|
|
# time delta given as str, datetime.timedelta, and pd.Timedelta.
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl.offset('-1000 days').as_of_date,
|
|
cl.as_of_date + pd.Timedelta(days=-1000)
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl.offset(timedelta(days=-1000)).as_of_date,
|
|
cl.as_of_date + pd.Timedelta(days=-1000)
|
|
)
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
cl.offset(pd.Timedelta('-1000 days')).as_of_date,
|
|
cl.as_of_date + pd.Timedelta(days=-1000)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# An offset of zero should give the original chain.
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[0], cl.offset(0)[0])
|
|
self.assertEqual(cl[0], cl.offset("0 days")[0])
|
|
|
|
# A string that doesn't represent a time delta should raise a
|
|
# ValueError.
|
|
with self.assertRaises(ValueError):
|
|
cl.offset("blah")
|
|
|
|
def test_cme_code_to_month(self):
|
|
codes = {
|
|
'F': 1, # January
|
|
'G': 2, # February
|
|
'H': 3, # March
|
|
'J': 4, # April
|
|
'K': 5, # May
|
|
'M': 6, # June
|
|
'N': 7, # July
|
|
'Q': 8, # August
|
|
'U': 9, # September
|
|
'V': 10, # October
|
|
'X': 11, # November
|
|
'Z': 12 # December
|
|
}
|
|
for key in codes:
|
|
self.assertEqual(codes[key], cme_code_to_month(key))
|
|
|
|
def test_month_to_cme_code(self):
|
|
codes = {
|
|
1: 'F', # January
|
|
2: 'G', # February
|
|
3: 'H', # March
|
|
4: 'J', # April
|
|
5: 'K', # May
|
|
6: 'M', # June
|
|
7: 'N', # July
|
|
8: 'Q', # August
|
|
9: 'U', # September
|
|
10: 'V', # October
|
|
11: 'X', # November
|
|
12: 'Z', # December
|
|
}
|
|
for key in codes:
|
|
self.assertEqual(codes[key], month_to_cme_code(key))
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestAssetDBVersioning(ZiplineTestCase):
|
|
|
|
def init_instance_fixtures(self):
|
|
super(TestAssetDBVersioning, self).init_instance_fixtures()
|
|
self.engine = eng = self.enter_instance_context(empty_assets_db())
|
|
self.metadata = sa.MetaData(eng, reflect=True)
|
|
|
|
def test_check_version(self):
|
|
version_table = self.metadata.tables['version_info']
|
|
|
|
# This should not raise an error
|
|
check_version_info(self.engine, version_table, ASSET_DB_VERSION)
|
|
|
|
# This should fail because the version is too low
|
|
with self.assertRaises(AssetDBVersionError):
|
|
check_version_info(
|
|
self.engine,
|
|
version_table,
|
|
ASSET_DB_VERSION - 1,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# This should fail because the version is too high
|
|
with self.assertRaises(AssetDBVersionError):
|
|
check_version_info(
|
|
self.engine,
|
|
version_table,
|
|
ASSET_DB_VERSION + 1,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
def test_write_version(self):
|
|
version_table = self.metadata.tables['version_info']
|
|
version_table.delete().execute()
|
|
|
|
# Assert that the version is not present in the table
|
|
self.assertIsNone(sa.select((version_table.c.version,)).scalar())
|
|
|
|
# This should fail because the table has no version info and is,
|
|
# therefore, consdered v0
|
|
with self.assertRaises(AssetDBVersionError):
|
|
check_version_info(self.engine, version_table, -2)
|
|
|
|
# This should not raise an error because the version has been written
|
|
write_version_info(self.engine, version_table, -2)
|
|
check_version_info(self.engine, version_table, -2)
|
|
|
|
# Assert that the version is in the table and correct
|
|
self.assertEqual(sa.select((version_table.c.version,)).scalar(), -2)
|
|
|
|
# Assert that trying to overwrite the version fails
|
|
with self.assertRaises(sa.exc.IntegrityError):
|
|
write_version_info(self.engine, version_table, -3)
|
|
|
|
def test_finder_checks_version(self):
|
|
version_table = self.metadata.tables['version_info']
|
|
version_table.delete().execute()
|
|
write_version_info(self.engine, version_table, -2)
|
|
check_version_info(self.engine, version_table, -2)
|
|
|
|
# Assert that trying to build a finder with a bad db raises an error
|
|
with self.assertRaises(AssetDBVersionError):
|
|
AssetFinder(engine=self.engine)
|
|
|
|
# Change the version number of the db to the correct version
|
|
version_table.delete().execute()
|
|
write_version_info(self.engine, version_table, ASSET_DB_VERSION)
|
|
check_version_info(self.engine, version_table, ASSET_DB_VERSION)
|
|
|
|
# Now that the versions match, this Finder should succeed
|
|
AssetFinder(engine=self.engine)
|
|
|
|
def test_downgrade(self):
|
|
# Attempt to downgrade a current assets db all the way down to v0
|
|
conn = self.engine.connect()
|
|
|
|
# first downgrade to v3
|
|
downgrade(self.engine, 3)
|
|
metadata = sa.MetaData(conn)
|
|
metadata.reflect(bind=self.engine)
|
|
check_version_info(conn, metadata.tables['version_info'], 3)
|
|
self.assertFalse('exchange_full' in metadata.tables)
|
|
|
|
# now go all the way to v0
|
|
downgrade(self.engine, 0)
|
|
|
|
# Verify that the db version is now 0
|
|
metadata = sa.MetaData(conn)
|
|
metadata.reflect(bind=self.engine)
|
|
version_table = metadata.tables['version_info']
|
|
check_version_info(self.engine, version_table, 0)
|
|
|
|
# Check some of the v1-to-v0 downgrades
|
|
self.assertTrue('futures_contracts' in metadata.tables)
|
|
self.assertTrue('version_info' in metadata.tables)
|
|
self.assertFalse('tick_size' in
|
|
metadata.tables['futures_contracts'].columns)
|
|
self.assertTrue('contract_multiplier' in
|
|
metadata.tables['futures_contracts'].columns)
|
|
|
|
def test_impossible_downgrade(self):
|
|
# Attempt to downgrade a current assets db to a
|
|
# higher-than-current version
|
|
with self.assertRaises(AssetDBImpossibleDowngrade):
|
|
downgrade(self.engine, ASSET_DB_VERSION + 5)
|