mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/evil_MoE.git
synced 2026-06-27 16:30:30 +08:00
8f39c4a69f
Spec was stale (recommended hard sparse "Version A", the DEMix absorption-killer). Rewrite to match what is implemented and what we clarified: - pseudocode-first: lora2r 2-expert forward, seeded rank-1 cosine router, GRPO+pin loop, deploy ablation. For 2 experts the "proper" router IS rank-1 (softmax over 2 = sigmoid of one direction), seeded with v_act. - "Why soft, not top-k" reframed as a tradeoff, not a verdict: hard routing closes the leak but needs a router that catches all hacks; soft keeps absorption available but leaks (1-w). DEMix only bites if we rely on absorption. - Evidence section from two literature searches. Forced localization has working precedents (single bad direction: emergent misalignment/persona/refusal; behavioural expert seeding: SteerMoE, geometric cosine routing, cluster-aware upcycling; ablation + repair: NAEE/MoE-Pruner; router anchor: SEUF/MoTE). Emergent localization does not (standing-committee, topic-driven routing). So seed+pin are load-bearing. - 3-way/3-expert noted as an extension (closer to production), 2 experts for the decisive causal run. README: add Router dynamics (three forces, one pin-vs-reward conflict, mitigations). Add HF "MoE in Transformers" blog to docs/papers (force-added past the docs gitignore). Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>