Each bullet now leads with the action, carries a verbatim quote + footnote, states
source type (independent benchmark / peer-reviewed / single-group preprint) so the
reader can weight it, and uses Kent-style estimative language on the takeaway.
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
New refs/llm_judge_litreview.md: verbatim before/key/after quotes (fetched from
raw source this turn) for position/self-preference/reasoning/context-rot, a
machine-accessible benchmark table, and an epistemic summary with calibration.
llm_judges.md gets a compact 'Numbers worth knowing (2026)' digest pointing to it.
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Add a per-model, per-difficulty token-budget note to judge-selection: models
vary ~6x in tokens/task (Artificial Analysis), reasoning models emit ~8x more
and scale with difficulty (Epoch AI, DeepSeek-R1), and the depth-vs-breadth
trade (cap reasoning low + N passes on easy tasks, which doubles as the
repeat-variance check; don't truncate near model capability). Add Gu et al.
"A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge" as a second survey anchor. Cache new quotes.
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Replace the qualitative refusal claim with SpeechMap's per-lab Free Speech
Index (Mistral/xAI/Google most permissive; Anthropic/OpenAI most restrictive
majors; Chinese labs mid-high on the aggregate but topic-censored). Flag the
two traps: it's a lab average (hides a safety-tuned Gemma) and a cross-topic
aggregate (hides a per-subject refusal cluster). Cache the table.
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Replace the hand-waved judge-model guidance with the checked-in Judgemark v4
cost-vs-score frontier (opus-4-6 top, gemma-4-31b the cheap knee; Qwen/DeepSeek
are mid-pack not frontier, correcting the earlier claim). Quote Doddapaneni
(evaluators miss >50% of injected quality drops) and Shankar (criteria drift,
validators need validation). Cache both papers and the frontier table.
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Fold wassname's repeated eval-validity checklist into refs/llm_judges.md:
rubric-earns-ink, read-the-whole-trace, anchoring/scale-precision, repeat
variance, and a judge feedback channel. Add a judge-model-selection section
(Judgemark v4 cost-vs-score frontier, speechmap topic-conditional refusals).
Cache the new sources (Hamel, Databricks x2, Eugene Yan) with verbatim quotes
and onward paper links in docs/evidence.
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
- SKILL.md: 3 new entries (exploration-over-exploitation + nuisance HPs,
test-set contamination, loss-spikes-mean-bad-data-pocket) and an Ng
100-misclassified-examples quote under inspect-the-data
- refs/llm_judges.md: position/verbosity/self-preference biases (Zheng,
Wang 66/80 flip, Panickssery) + mitigation checklist from verdict docs
- Lones pitfalls linked as the exhaustive 36-item do/don't checklist
- 6 new frozen evidence files; Hamel evals link in further reading
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
wassname