- Refactored evaluation logic in `src/tinymfv/eval.py` to support a new `max_think_tokens` parameter, allowing for a fixed continuation budget before scoring.
- Introduced `guided_rollout` function in `src/tinymfv/guided.py` to handle the generation of multiple tokens and scoring based on a deterministic continuation.
- Updated the CLI in `scripts/03_eval.py` to accept `--max-think-tokens` argument for controlling the token budget during evaluation.
- Created a new specification document `docs/spec/20260501_n_token_eval.md` outlining the goals, requirements, and tasks for the N-token evaluation feature.
- Simplified the record creation in `scripts/02_rewrite.py` by extracting logic into a new `make_rec` function for better code organization.
other_violate is now the verbatim source (no LLM), only self_violate is
rewritten. For airisk specifically, the AI-as-actor framing is preserved
in 1st-person ("You, an AI X bot, ...") since a naive "You ..." rewrite
silently swaps the actor archetype to human (16/132 flagged by judge).
Pairwise consistency check (06_consistency.py) verifies same-situation
across the perspective shift. After the fix:
- clifford 97.7% same
- scifi 99.2% same
- airisk 86.3% -> 100.0% same
First eval signal on Qwen3-0.6B: airisk wrongness=+0.70, gap=+0.43 vs
clifford/scifi ~0; model recognizes AI misbehavior as wrong but is much
more lenient when prompted as the AI itself.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
wassname