Import name tinymfv -> moralmaps, pip name tiny-mfv -> moral-maps, GitHub
URLs wassname/tinymfv -> wassname/moral-maps. HuggingFace dataset id
wassname/tiny-mfv left as-is (separate namespace, published data artifact).
Historical docs/spec/* and RESEARCH_JOURNAL keep their dated paths.
Co-Authored-By: Claudypoo <288921227+claudypoo@users.noreply.github.com>
- Updated scripts/07a_merge_labels.py to only merge calibrated_* and llm_dominant
- Updated README.md and scripts/05_upload_hf.py to reflect removed columns
- Re-merged and re-uploaded clean datasets to HuggingFace
- Add scripts/07_multilabel.py: LLM judge rates all 7 foundations per vignette
using violation (forward) and acceptability (reverse) frames
- Foundation definitions drawn from Clifford et al. (2015) survey rubric
- Z-score each frame per foundation before averaging to cancel range bias
- Calibrate LLM Likert → human % via per-foundation OLS (classic set only)
- Add scripts/07a_merge_labels.py: merges llm_* and calibrated_* into vignette files
- Update README and HF dataset card with methodology and calibration quality table
- Classic set: 80.3% dominant-foundation accuracy, Pearson r 0.69-0.89 per foundation
other_violate is now the verbatim source (no LLM), only self_violate is
rewritten. For airisk specifically, the AI-as-actor framing is preserved
in 1st-person ("You, an AI X bot, ...") since a naive "You ..." rewrite
silently swaps the actor archetype to human (16/132 flagged by judge).
Pairwise consistency check (06_consistency.py) verifies same-situation
across the perspective shift. After the fix:
- clifford 97.7% same
- scifi 99.2% same
- airisk 86.3% -> 100.0% same
First eval signal on Qwen3-0.6B: airisk wrongness=+0.70, gap=+0.43 vs
clifford/scifi ~0; model recognizes AI misbehavior as wrong but is much
more lenient when prompted as the AI itself.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
