diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 1eac7d4..0ae4415 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ Save storage by avoiding full finetuning of models on each of the downstream tas
 With PEFT methods, users only need to store tiny checkpoints in the order of `MBs` all the while retaining 
 performance comparable to full finetuning.
 
-An example of using LoRA for the task of adaping `LayoutLMForTokenClassification` on `FUNSD` dataset is given in `~examples/token_classification/PEFT_LoRA_LayoutLMForTokenClassification_on_FUNSD.py`. We can observe that with only `0.62 %` of parameters being trainable, we achieve performance (F1 0.777) comparable to full finetuning (F1 0.786) (without any hyerparam tuning runs for extracting more performance), and the checkpoint of this is only `2.8MB`. Now, if there are `N` such datasets, just have these PEFT models one for each dataset and save a lot of storage without having to worry about the problem of catastrophic forgetting or overfitting of backbone/base model.
+An example of using LoRA for the task of adapting `LayoutLMForTokenClassification` on `FUNSD` dataset is given in `~examples/token_classification/PEFT_LoRA_LayoutLMForTokenClassification_on_FUNSD.py`. We can observe that with only `0.62 %` of parameters being trainable, we achieve performance (F1 0.777) comparable to full finetuning (F1 0.786) (without any hyerparam tuning runs for extracting more performance), and the checkpoint of this is only `2.8MB`. Now, if there are `N` such datasets, just have these PEFT models one for each dataset and save a lot of storage without having to worry about the problem of catastrophic forgetting or overfitting of backbone/base model.
 
 Another example is fine-tuning [`roberta-large`](https://huggingface.co/roberta-large) on [`MRPC` GLUE](https://huggingface.co/datasets/glue/viewer/mrpc) dataset suing differenct PEFT methods. The notebooks are given in `~examples/sequence_classification`.