mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/pi-lgtm.git
synced 2026-06-27 14:16:01 +08:00
5b800653a3
Reviewer feedback: the LGTM extension's epistemic core is good but UX is too ceremonial — every task forced through lgtm_ask + /lgtm even bookkeeping like "monitor pueue 30". Two-tier split: - Tasks: agent-managed. TaskUpdate(status=completed) now allowed when no lgtm evidence is stored. Trivial subtasks lead up to verification without ceremony. - LGTMs: significant claims. lgtm_ask still triggers robot review; once evidence is stored, completion is locked to /lgtm so the gate can't be bypassed. Other UX: - TaskList output grouped: Active / Awaiting sign-off / Pending / Completed. - New getDisplayStatus(task) derives awaiting_signoff from pending_approval. - Widget header shows N awaiting sign-off count. - /lgtm accepts multiple ids: /lgtm 1 2 3 (also #1, commas). - lgtm_ask field descriptions encourage one short sentence per field — keep thinking discipline, drop verbosity. - SYSTEM_REMINDER nudges progress updates and cleanup of completed/irrelevant tasks, not just lgtm_ask. Also includes pending rubric extension on RobotReviewRecord. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>