## [D,Q] Rationalist art or artists? * Author: u/traverseda *With dread but cautious optimism** * URL: https://www.reddit.com/r/rational/comments/2xy4l7/dq_rationalist_art_or_artists/ * Score: 7 * Created: 2015-03-04T20:58:50 ### Post: Obviously I don't want art that is rationalist. But I've recently acquired an item that is in clear need of something to be painted on it. Being generally uncreative, I wouldn't mind some links to art that has rationalist/transhumanist/computery themes. When in doubt, I'll probably just try and get something dresden codak-ey. ### Comments: > **u/buckykat** [+5] (an hour later) > > in strong female protagonist (a webcomic), lisa's lab is full of transhumanist-themed artwork. examples [here](http://strongfemaleprotagonist.com/issue-5/page-55/), [here](http://strongfemaleprotagonist.com/issue-5/page-56-2/), [here](http://strongfemaleprotagonist.com/issue-5/page-59-2/), and [here](http://strongfemaleprotagonist.com/issue-5/page-61-2/) > > and dresden codak-y sounds good, hob especially is beautiful. >> **u/traverseda** [+3] *With dread but cautious optimism* (an hour later) >> >> >Punch the sun baby >> >> Thanks, that's a great example. >>> **u/buckykat** [+3] (2 hours later) >>> >>> And Turing and Lovelace collecting apples from the tree of knowledge and John Henry and the steam robot joined in friendship. >>>> **u/traverseda** [+4] *With dread but cautious optimism* (2 hours later) >>>> >>>> >Turing and Lovelace collecting apples from the tree of knowledge >>>> >>>> I already get accused of being a satanist every few years. Although I'm not sure those people would get the reference... >>>>> **u/buckykat** [+5] (2 hours later) >>>>> >>>>> The serpent is the abrahamic Prometheus. >>> **u/None** [+1] (3 days later) >>> >>> [Wow.](http://strongfemaleprotagonist.com/issue-5/page-73-2/) That women is almost kinda reasonable. But not *quite*. But I love the attitude. > **u/Nighzmarquls** [+5] (an hour later) > > Beware of transhumanist art that has it's roots in groups from the 90s... for some reason I've noticed there is a massive bias of 'OMG WE HAVE ANY ART AT ALL?! IT MUST BE GOOD' and it really is not. > > like on the actual scales of evaluating art and aesthetic it's mediocre and occasionally clever at best (Orion's arm I am glaring judgmentally at you) ---