## Greg Egan - "In the Ruins" - rational and rationalist. * Author: u/ArgentStonecutter *Emergency Mustelid Hologram** * URL: http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/MISC/RUINS/Ruins.html * Score: 19 * Created: 2015-07-30T14:51:05 ### Post: [Link to content](http://gregegan.customer.netspace.net.au/MISC/RUINS/Ruins.html) ### Comments: > **u/Rangi42** [+12] (3 hours later) > > Heh, "Kardashian type-3 civilization." >> **u/Transfuturist** [+1] *Carthago delenda est.* (12 hours later) >> >> Rational Keeping Up. >> >> ... > **u/None** [+4] (6 hours later) > > This is easily the most horrifying dystopian satire I've seen since *Brave New World*. >> **u/PeridexisErrant** [+2] *put aside fear for courage, and death for life* (9 hours later) >> >> Eh, it could be a lot worse. Clearly other parts of the world are doing OK, and scientists can still be found... >>> **u/None** [+1] (10 hours later) >>> >>> > Eh, it could be a lot worse. >>> >>> Well yes, but that's why it's satire rather than "Everyone's dead, Jim." >>>> **u/PeridexisErrant** [+2] *put aside fear for courage, and death for life* (14 hours later) >>>> >>>> I meant more that in most of the classic examples, you get a sense that this is the state of the whole world - eg *1984*, *Brave New World*, etc - whereas here it's just a country that many people don't like anyway. >>>> >>>> I mean, there are *already* very large and powerful countries where things generally suck, and that's normal (for them, which is bad) not a dystopia. >>>>> **u/None** [+6] (21 hours later) >>>>> >>>>> Actually, in *1984* we ever saw or heard anything outside the UK. For all we know, it could have been a North Korea-style failed state. >>>>> >>>>> >I mean, there are already very large and powerful countries where things generally suck, and that's normal (for them, which is bad) not a dystopia. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, but my original comment was a deliberate exaggeration for effect. > **u/None** [+4] (56 minutes later) > > I'm not really a fan of how heavy-handed the story is. It reads as a caricature. And... the word "nerd" apparently bothers him? I mean, I see his point kind of, but I don't feel very persuaded by it. I mostly like Egan though, but I'm afraid the stories I like most are the least rational. >> **u/ArgentStonecutter** [+7] *Emergency Mustelid Hologram* (an hour later) >> >> It was the heavy-handedness that reminded me of this subreddit. I mean, you wouldn't describe HPMoR as "subtle" would you? \^\^ >>> **u/BadGoyWithAGun** [+7] (3 hours later) >>> >>> On the Author Tract scale, HPMOR is right up there with Left Behind. >> **u/ArisKatsaris** [+5] *Sidebar Contender* (18 hours later) >> >> > And... the word "nerd" apparently bothers him? >> >> It IS an insult, you know. That some of us use it on ourselves is just like all "reappropriations" of words. Call yourself a nerd all you like, but if you don't consider yourself one, please also don't use it to describe others either -- not unless you want to belittle them. > **u/hyenagrins** [+2] (13 hours later) > > From sidebar: > > > The story is like a puzzle; readers can reach the same solution as the characters by using the information provided earlier in the story. > > The ultimate if a bit crude application of this principle, I stopped mid story and grabbed a piece of paper to work out the solution. And the final connection to higher dimension rotation is undoubtedly satisfying. ---