From b531c162a229644f6daaa673ab69cd1e74df0da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lindsey Heagy Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:50:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] tab so we don't cut off the first characters in the docstring --- .../Examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.py | 52 +++++++++---------- docs/examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.rst | 52 +++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) diff --git a/SimPEG/Examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.py b/SimPEG/Examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.py index 0a719ea7..76af4a3d 100644 --- a/SimPEG/Examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.py +++ b/SimPEG/Examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.py @@ -11,42 +11,42 @@ except Exception: def run(plotIt=True): """ - EM: Schenkel and Morrison Casing Model - ====================================== + EM: Schenkel and Morrison Casing Model + ====================================== - Here we create and run a FDEM forward simulation to calculate the vertical - current inside a steel-cased. The model is based on the Schenkel and - Morrison Casing Model, and the results are used in a 2016 SEG abstract by - Yang et al. + Here we create and run a FDEM forward simulation to calculate the vertical + current inside a steel-cased. The model is based on the Schenkel and + Morrison Casing Model, and the results are used in a 2016 SEG abstract by + Yang et al. - - Schenkel, C.J., and H.F. Morrison, 1990, Effects of well casing on potential field measurements using downhole current sources: Geophysical prospecting, 38, 663-686. + - Schenkel, C.J., and H.F. Morrison, 1990, Effects of well casing on potential field measurements using downhole current sources: Geophysical prospecting, 38, 663-686. - The model consists of: - - Air: Conductivity 1e-8 S/m, above z = 0 - - Background: conductivity 1e-2 S/m, below z = 0 - - Casing: conductivity 1e6 S/m - - 300m long - - radius of 0.1m - - thickness of 6e-3m + The model consists of: + - Air: Conductivity 1e-8 S/m, above z = 0 + - Background: conductivity 1e-2 S/m, below z = 0 + - Casing: conductivity 1e6 S/m + - 300m long + - radius of 0.1m + - thickness of 6e-3m - Inside the casing, we take the same conductivity as the background. + Inside the casing, we take the same conductivity as the background. - We are using an EM code to simulate DC, so we use frequency low enough - that the skin depth inside the casing is longer than the casing length (f - = 1e-6 Hz). The plot produced is of the current inside the casing. + We are using an EM code to simulate DC, so we use frequency low enough + that the skin depth inside the casing is longer than the casing length (f + = 1e-6 Hz). The plot produced is of the current inside the casing. - These results are shown in the SEG abstract by Yang et al., 2016: 3D DC - resistivity modeling of steel casing for reservoir monitoring using - equivalent resistor network. The solver used to produce these results and - achieve the CPU time of ~30s is Mumps, which was installed using pymatsolver_ + These results are shown in the SEG abstract by Yang et al., 2016: 3D DC + resistivity modeling of steel casing for reservoir monitoring using + equivalent resistor network. The solver used to produce these results and + achieve the CPU time of ~30s is Mumps, which was installed using pymatsolver_ - .. _pymatsolver: https://github.com/rowanc1/pymatsolver + .. _pymatsolver: https://github.com/rowanc1/pymatsolver - This example is on figshare: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3126961.v1 + This example is on figshare: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3126961.v1 - If you would use this example for a code comparison, or build upon it, a - citation would be much appreciated! + If you would use this example for a code comparison, or build upon it, a + citation would be much appreciated! """ diff --git a/docs/examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.rst b/docs/examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.rst index 77bf1fa2..55f00168 100644 --- a/docs/examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.rst +++ b/docs/examples/EM_Schenkel_Morrison_Casing.rst @@ -9,42 +9,42 @@ .. --------------------------------- .. -Schenkel and Morrison Casing Model -================================== +EM: Schenkel and Morrison Casing Model +====================================== - we create and run a FDEM forward simulation to calculate the vertical -ent inside a steel-cased. The model is based on the Schenkel and -ison Casing Model, and the results are used in a 2016 SEG abstract by - et al. +Here we create and run a FDEM forward simulation to calculate the vertical +current inside a steel-cased. The model is based on the Schenkel and +Morrison Casing Model, and the results are used in a 2016 SEG abstract by +Yang et al. -henkel, C.J., and H.F. Morrison, 1990, Effects of well casing on potential field measurements using downhole current sources: Geophysical prospecting, 38, 663-686. +- Schenkel, C.J., and H.F. Morrison, 1990, Effects of well casing on potential field measurements using downhole current sources: Geophysical prospecting, 38, 663-686. -model consists of: -r: Conductivity 1e-8 S/m, above z = 0 -ckground: conductivity 1e-2 S/m, below z = 0 -sing: conductivity 1e6 S/m -- 300m long -- radius of 0.1m -- thickness of 6e-3m +The model consists of: +- Air: Conductivity 1e-8 S/m, above z = 0 +- Background: conductivity 1e-2 S/m, below z = 0 +- Casing: conductivity 1e6 S/m + - 300m long + - radius of 0.1m + - thickness of 6e-3m -de the casing, we take the same conductivity as the background. +Inside the casing, we take the same conductivity as the background. -re using an EM code to simulate DC, so we use frequency low enough - the skin depth inside the casing is longer than the casing length (f --6 Hz). The plot produced is of the current inside the casing. +We are using an EM code to simulate DC, so we use frequency low enough +that the skin depth inside the casing is longer than the casing length (f += 1e-6 Hz). The plot produced is of the current inside the casing. -e results are shown in the SEG abstract by Yang et al., 2016: 3D DC -stivity modeling of steel casing for reservoir monitoring using -valent resistor network. The solver used to produce these results and -eve the CPU time of ~30s is Mumps, which was installed using pymatsolver_ +These results are shown in the SEG abstract by Yang et al., 2016: 3D DC +resistivity modeling of steel casing for reservoir monitoring using +equivalent resistor network. The solver used to produce these results and +achieve the CPU time of ~30s is Mumps, which was installed using pymatsolver_ -pymatsolver: https://github.com/rowanc1/pymatsolver +.. _pymatsolver: https://github.com/rowanc1/pymatsolver - example is on figshare: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3126961.v1 +This example is on figshare: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3126961.v1 -ou would use this example for a code comparison, or build upon it, a -tion would be much appreciated! +If you would use this example for a code comparison, or build upon it, a +citation would be much appreciated!