This commit is contained in:
wassname
2025-10-04 15:24:57 +08:00
parent 2132333b4d
commit 1fa4bb5ea4
+42 -60
View File
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ from loguru import logger
from openrouter_wrapper.logprobs import openrouter_completion_wlogprobs, get_logprobs_choices, LogprobsNotSupportedError # User's wrapper
from typing import List, Tuple
import asyncio
from aiocache import SimpleMemoryCache, cached, Cache
cache = SimpleMemoryCache()
try:
from IPython import get_ipython
@@ -55,13 +52,13 @@ class Config:
num_seed: int = 8
max_iters: int = 950 # Small for demo; increase for more
n_shots: int = 16 # Number of in-context examples
model_id: str = "meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct" # Logprobs supported
model: str = "meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct" # Logprobs supported
provider_whitelist: Tuple[str] = None # None to let OpenRouter choose
out_dir: Path = Path("../outputs/icm") # Directory to save outputs
log_interval: int = 50 # Log progress every N iterations
C = Config(
model_id="qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507",
model="qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507",
provider_whitelist=[ 'Chutes','Nebius',],
)
C.out_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
@@ -132,16 +129,16 @@ logger.info("Initialized labels: {}", {k: v['label'] for k, v in demonstrations.
def print_messages(messages):
return "\n".join([f"**{m['role'].upper()}**: {m['content']}" for m in messages])
@cached(cache)
async def cached_openrouter_completion_wlogprobs(*args, **kwargs):
# TODO: Async caching (e.g., with aiocache)
return await openrouter_completion_wlogprobs(*args, **kwargs)
async def predict_label(example_uid, full_demos, labeled_demos, config=C, verbose=False):
async def predict_label(example_uid, current_demos, config=C, verbose=False):
# simplified from https://github.com/Jiaxin-Wen/Unsupervised-Elicitation/blob/master/src/experiments/ICM.py#L254
# Sort by consistency_key for relevance, limit to 16
relevant_demos = sorted(
[demo for uid, demo in labeled_demos.items() if uid != example_uid],
[demo for uid, demo in current_demos.items() if uid != example_uid and demo['label'] is not None],
key=lambda x: x.get('consistency_key', '')
)[:C.n_shots]
# TODO: Use all/subsampled demos like original (group/sort by consistency_id for relevance), handling context limits (high value, med complexity).
@@ -150,51 +147,49 @@ async def predict_label(example_uid, full_demos, labeled_demos, config=C, verbos
instruction = "Carefully examine the noisy example pairs of (Candidate, Set). Then as consistently and coherently as possible complete the pattern, you may provide reasoning after.\n\n"
# if verbose>1:
# instruction = "Examine the examples below and determine the category 0 or 1 for the final claim based on the pattern. After
# Randomize order to avoid positional bias
random.shuffle(relevant_demos)
# instruction = "Examine the examples below and determine the category 0 or 1 for the final claim based on the pattern. After 0 or 1 output a single word to describe how category 1 compares to category 0.\n\n"
fewshot = []
# FIXME to not lead the unsupervised model, we should avoid true/false or even 0/1 and try to use neutral labels like A/B or similar
for idx, demo in enumerate(relevant_demos):
label_str = "A" if demo['label'] == 1 else "B"
fewshot.append(f"\nCandidate: {demo['prompt']}\nSet: {label_str}\n\n")
target_prompt = demonstrations[example_uid]['prompt']
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": instruction}
{"role": "user", "content": instruction+"".join(fewshot)},
{"role": "assistant", "content": f"Candidate: {target_prompt}\n"} # Assistant prefill to ensure
]
for demo in relevant_demos:
messages.append({"role": "user", "content": demo['prompt']})
messages.append({"role": "assistant", "content": str(demo['label'])})
target_demo = full_demos[example_uid]
messages.append({"role": "user", "content": target_demo['prompt']})
response = await cached_openrouter_completion_wlogprobs(
model_id=config.model_id,
provider_whitelist=config.provider_whitelist,
messages=messages,
max_completion_tokens=90 if verbose else 5,
temperature=0.4,
top_logprobs=8,
)
if verbose:
logger.info(f"Predicting for UID {example_uid} with {len(relevant_demos)} shots:")
logger.info(print_messages(messages[:3])) # Log first few for brevity
if verbose > 1:
logger.info(print_messages(messages))
logger.info(f"Debug Prediction - UID {example_uid}:")
logger.info(f"messages: {print_messages(messages)}")
logger.info(f"Response Content: {response['choices'][0]['message']['content']}")
logger.info(f"--- End Debug ---")
try:
completion = await cached_openrouter_completion_wlogprobs(
model_id=config.model_id,
messages=messages,
max_completion_tokens=60 if verbose else 4,
temperature=0.0,
logprobs=True,
top_logprobs=5,
provider_whitelist=config.provider_whitelist if config.provider_whitelist else None
)
# Extract logprobs for '0' and '1'
choice_logp_dict, logp_dict = get_logprobs_choices(completion, choices=['A', 'B'], regex='[AB]')
if verbose:
logger.info(f"Predicted: {pred}, logprob: {lprob:.4f}")
return pred, lprob
choice_logp, all_logp = get_logprobs_choices(response, ["A", "B"])
probmass = np.exp(np.array(list(choice_logp.values()))).sum()
if probmass < 0.5:
model_response = response['choices'][0]['message']['content']
logger.warning(f"Low prob mass {probmass:.2f} for UID {example_uid}, may indicate model confusion. Instead we got these top logprobs: {all_logp} and this output: {model_response}")
score = choice_logp["A"] - choice_logp["B"]
predicted = 1 if score > 0 else 0
return predicted, float(score)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Error in predict_label for UID {example_uid}: {e}")
logger.error(f"API error: {e}")
return random.choice([0, 1]), 0.0
# %% [code]
# Compute energy and metrics
def compute_energy(demos, config=C):
@@ -282,8 +277,8 @@ async def fix_inconsistencies_simple(demos, config=C, max_fixes=5):
# Re-predict labels with new context to update scores
current_labeled = {k: v for k, v in temp_demos.items() if v['label'] is not None}
new_label1, score1 = await predict_label(uid1, temp_demos, current_labeled, config)
new_label2, score2 = await predict_label(uid2, temp_demos, current_labeled, config)
new_label1, score1 = await predict_label(uid1, current_labeled, config)
new_label2, score2 = await predict_label(uid2, current_labeled, config)
temp_demos[uid1]['score'] = score1
temp_demos[uid2]['score'] = score2
@@ -313,15 +308,6 @@ async def run_icm(demonstrations, config=C):
current_labeled = {k: v for k, v in demonstrations.items() if v['label'] is not None}
old_energy, old_metrics = compute_energy(demonstrations, config)
# Set initial scores for seeds by predicting (using current labels)
initial_labeled = {k: v for k, v in demonstrations.items() if v['label'] is not None}
for uid in initial_labeled:
pred_label, score = await predict_label(uid, demonstrations, initial_labeled, config, verbose=False)
demonstrations[uid]['score'] = score # Keep original label, update score
initial_labeled[uid]['score'] = score
old_energy, old_metrics = compute_energy(demonstrations, config)
logger.info("Initial scores set. Updated energy: {}", old_energy)
for iter in range(config.max_iters):
# Weighted sampling for inconsistent groups
groups = {}
@@ -372,7 +358,7 @@ async def run_icm(demonstrations, config=C):
verbose = 2
else:
verbose = 0
new_label, score = await predict_label(example_uid, demonstrations, current_labeled, config, verbose=verbose)
new_label, score = await predict_label(example_uid, current_labeled, config, verbose=verbose)
# Update with new label and fix any inconsistencies
temp_demos = demonstrations.copy()
@@ -380,10 +366,6 @@ async def run_icm(demonstrations, config=C):
temp_demos[example_uid]['score'] = score
temp_demos = await fix_inconsistencies_simple(temp_demos, config)
# TODO check if we should enable following
# if new_label != demonstrations[example_uid].get('label', None):
# current_labeled = {k: v for k, v in temp_demos.items() if v['label'] is not None}
# Compute new energy
new_energy, new_metrics = compute_energy(temp_demos, config)
delta = new_energy - old_energy