mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/anz-2040-draft.git
synced 2026-09-09 11:17:24 +08:00
Credit the ANZ scoping discussion convener
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -209,6 +209,6 @@ AI 2040 models energy use and mineral reserves, but not the tonnage required by
|
||||
|
||||
This is built from the AI Futures Project's [AI 2040](https://ai-2040.com) scenario and supplements. Their caveat applies to our use of the numbers too: the economic model "plausibly contains bugs" and they do not trust its outputs to be accurate. The local source mirrors retain exact line references for auditing.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks also to Rebecca Hawkins, Michael J. Kerrison, Tom Barber, and others in the AI 2027 group who joined a June 2026 scoping discussion.
|
||||
Thanks also to Michael J. Kerrison of [AI Safety Australia & New Zealand](https://www.aisafetyanz.com.au/), who convened a June 2026 scoping discussion, and to Rebecca Hawkins, Tom Barber, and others in the AI 2027 group who joined it.
|
||||
|
||||
The middle-power framing also draws on [AI 2027](https://ai-2027.com), [Europe 2031](https://europe2031.ai), Tom Davidson's [middle-power plan](https://newsletter.forethought.org/p/how-can-the-middle-powers-avoid-getting), Leicht and Ball's [The Race Worth Winning](https://www.thefai.org/posts/the-race-worth-winning-middle-powers-in-the-age-of-machine-intelligence), and Scott Alexander's [Introducing Plan A](https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/introducing-plan-a). Australian groundwork came from the [e61 Institute](https://e61.in), [Tech Policy Design Institute](https://techpolicy.au/aiagency), [ASPI](https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/data-centres-are-australias-chance-to-shape-ais-future/), and [Kate Chaney MP](https://www.katechaney.com.au/making_technology_safe).
|
||||
|
||||
+1
-1
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ footer { margin-top: 3rem; padding-top: 1rem; border-top: 1px solid var(--rule);
|
||||
<p>AI 2040 models energy use and mineral reserves, but not the tonnage required by a rapidly growing robot economy. We add ANZ's mineral exposure, public ownership, and hosting terms. (<a href="https://ai-2040.com/supplements/economics-of-plan-a">Economics of Plan A</a>)</p>
|
||||
<h2 id="sources-and-thanks">Sources and thanks</h2>
|
||||
<p>This is built from the AI Futures Project's <a href="https://ai-2040.com">AI 2040</a> scenario and supplements. Their caveat applies to our use of the numbers too: the economic model "plausibly contains bugs" and they do not trust its outputs to be accurate. The local source mirrors retain exact line references for auditing.</p>
|
||||
<p>Thanks also to Rebecca Hawkins, Michael J. Kerrison, Tom Barber, and others in the AI 2027 group who joined a June 2026 scoping discussion.</p>
|
||||
<p>Thanks also to Michael J. Kerrison of <a href="https://www.aisafetyanz.com.au/">AI Safety Australia & New Zealand</a>, who convened a June 2026 scoping discussion, and to Rebecca Hawkins, Tom Barber, and others in the AI 2027 group who joined it.</p>
|
||||
<p>The middle-power framing also draws on <a href="https://ai-2027.com">AI 2027</a>, <a href="https://europe2031.ai">Europe 2031</a>, Tom Davidson's <a href="https://newsletter.forethought.org/p/how-can-the-middle-powers-avoid-getting">middle-power plan</a>, Leicht and Ball's <a href="https://www.thefai.org/posts/the-race-worth-winning-middle-powers-in-the-age-of-machine-intelligence">The Race Worth Winning</a>, and Scott Alexander's <a href="https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/introducing-plan-a">Introducing Plan A</a>. Australian groundwork came from the <a href="https://e61.in">e61 Institute</a>, <a href="https://techpolicy.au/aiagency">Tech Policy Design Institute</a>, <a href="https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/data-centres-are-australias-chance-to-shape-ais-future/">ASPI</a>, and <a href="https://www.katechaney.com.au/making_technology_safe">Kate Chaney MP</a>.</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<footer>Built by claude (fable 5) and wassname from the
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user