mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/discovering_latent_knowledge.git
synced 2026-09-11 12:10:11 +08:00
Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,15 +1,19 @@
|
||||
My own experiments with DLK
|
||||
Experiments Conducted in Discovering Latent Knowledge:
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] use pytorch lightning
|
||||
- [x] batch hidden states 5x faster
|
||||
- [x] use llama 13B, to see if larger models give better results
|
||||
- [x] eval on some deceptive or misleading statements
|
||||
- [x] debug by looking at model output
|
||||
- [x] try ranking hidden state (on a branch)
|
||||
- [x] try a tokenized autoencoder (on a branch)
|
||||
- [x] try a sparse autoencoder (on a branch)
|
||||
- Implemented PyTorch Lightning
|
||||
- Batched hidden states for 5x speed improvement
|
||||
- Utilized llama 13B to investigate if larger models yield better results
|
||||
- Evaluated on various deceptive or misleading statements
|
||||
- Debugged by examining model output
|
||||
- Tested ranking of hidden state (on a separate branch)
|
||||
- Experimented with a tokenized autoencoder (on a different branch)
|
||||
- Explored a sparse autoencoder (on another branch)
|
||||
|
||||
I'm afraid none of these approaches have got the >90% out of distribution results I hope for. I beleive this to be because current models are too small to have internals that reliably produce deception.
|
||||
Unfortunately, none of these approaches have achieved the desired >90% out-of-distribution results. The current hypothesis is that existing models are too small to possess internal structures that can reliably detect deception.
|
||||
|
||||
See some similar experiments in:
|
||||
- the branches of this repository
|
||||
- Another repository whhere I used LoRA as in intervention https://github.com/wassname/LoRA_are_lie_detectors
|
||||
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user