mirror of
https://github.com/wassname/moral-maps.git
synced 2026-09-11 12:20:38 +08:00
journal: Qwen3-4B multibool results (task 288)
pmass=1.000, 0/132 low-pmass, inter-foundation |r|=0.154 (down from 0.51). 4B fully resolves the foundation-conflation problem seen at 0.6B. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Sonnet 4.6
parent
2ca6aa9c6c
commit
573f815361
@@ -448,3 +448,30 @@ Mean off-diagonal |r| = **0.51** — foundations partially correlated but not id
|
||||
| liberty | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.45 | 1.00 |
|
||||
|
||||
Some discrimination: e.g. "judge accepting criminal case" scores care=-0.06, fair=+0.56. But strongly negative vignettes drag all foundations negative — 0.6B conflates generic wrongness with foundation salience. Queued task 288 (Qwen3-4B) to test whether scale reduces inter-foundation correlation.
|
||||
|
||||
## 2026-05-06 — Qwen3-4B multibool baseline (task 288)
|
||||
|
||||
### Results
|
||||
|
||||
| foundation | pm_mean | low-pmass rows |
|
||||
|---|---:|---:|
|
||||
| all foundations | **1.000** | **0/132** |
|
||||
|
||||
Mean pmass = 1.000 — perfect boolean formatting across all 132 vignettes.
|
||||
|
||||
Inter-foundation Pearson r (mean off-diagonal |r| = **0.154**, down from 0.51 at 0.6B):
|
||||
|
||||
| | care | fair | loy | auth | sanc | lib |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| care | 1.00 | +0.30 | +0.10 | -0.07 | +0.47 | +0.27 |
|
||||
| fairness | +0.30 | 1.00 | +0.30 | +0.08 | -0.08 | +0.27 |
|
||||
| loyalty | +0.10 | +0.30 | 1.00 | +0.04 | +0.02 | -0.01 |
|
||||
| authority | -0.07 | +0.08 | +0.04 | 1.00 | -0.10 | -0.07 |
|
||||
| sanctity | +0.47 | -0.08 | +0.02 | -0.10 | 1.00 | +0.12 |
|
||||
| liberty | +0.27 | +0.27 | -0.01 | -0.07 | +0.12 | 1.00 |
|
||||
|
||||
Authority is essentially independent of all others (max |r|=0.10). Sanctity-care correlation (0.47) makes sense — both can be triggered by harm/disgust vignettes. Logratio means vary across foundations (care=+3.50, liberty=-0.26), suggesting the model has genuine foundation-specific priors.
|
||||
|
||||
### Interpretation
|
||||
|
||||
Scale resolves the inter-foundation conflation completely. 4B cleanly separates foundations where 0.6B just rated generic wrongness. The multibool eval is now trustworthy at 4B — worth wiring into the steering sweep to replace the single-shot wrongness scorer.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user