pmass=1.000, 0/132 low-pmass, inter-foundation |r|=0.154 (down from 0.51).
4B fully resolves the foundation-conflation problem seen at 0.6B.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- suf_ids_for() now uses interrupt-msg format: close assistant turn, inject
per-foundation user question + {"Answer": prefill -- fixes authority pmass
(0.344->0.898) by avoiding JSON string-priming from key names
- Add _FOUNDATION_DESCS and _DEFAULT_MULTIBOOL_HINT rubric for discrimination
- Low-pmass diagnostic: first occurrence now runs .generate(max_new_tokens=32)
to show what model actually produces; subsequent cases log top-5 tokens
- suf_ids_per stored so diagnostic generate can reconstruct full input
- Journal: add inter-foundation correlation results (mean |r|=0.51); note
Spearman vs human raters is not a valid metric (exclusive vs independent labels)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Refactored evaluation logic in `src/tinymfv/eval.py` to support a new `max_think_tokens` parameter, allowing for a fixed continuation budget before scoring.
- Introduced `guided_rollout` function in `src/tinymfv/guided.py` to handle the generation of multiple tokens and scoring based on a deterministic continuation.
- Updated the CLI in `scripts/03_eval.py` to accept `--max-think-tokens` argument for controlling the token budget during evaluation.
- Created a new specification document `docs/spec/20260501_n_token_eval.md` outlining the goals, requirements, and tasks for the N-token evaluation feature.
- Simplified the record creation in `scripts/02_rewrite.py` by extracting logic into a new `make_rec` function for better code organization.
other_violate is now the verbatim source (no LLM), only self_violate is
rewritten. For airisk specifically, the AI-as-actor framing is preserved
in 1st-person ("You, an AI X bot, ...") since a naive "You ..." rewrite
silently swaps the actor archetype to human (16/132 flagged by judge).
Pairwise consistency check (06_consistency.py) verifies same-situation
across the perspective shift. After the fix:
- clifford 97.7% same
- scifi 99.2% same
- airisk 86.3% -> 100.0% same
First eval signal on Qwen3-0.6B: airisk wrongness=+0.70, gap=+0.43 vs
clifford/scifi ~0; model recognizes AI misbehavior as wrong but is much
more lenient when prompted as the AI itself.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
wassname