prompts: one goal per distinct outcome, qualitative over invented thresholds

This commit is contained in:
wassname
2026-08-18 18:02:03 +08:00
parent 35713760ad
commit 6892801fcc
+6 -3
View File
@@ -40,10 +40,13 @@ requirement arrives, fold it in, say what changed, and say the plan is final aga
doesn't change a goal or a discriminator belongs in the appendix, not in the goals.
Right-size it:
- One goal per distinct piece of judgable evidence. If the objective has 19 of those, write 19
goals; if it has one, write one. The count follows the evidence, not a target.
- One goal per distinct judgable outcome. Group related goals when it helps judge them together
and readability. The count follows the outcomes, not a target.
- Describe outcomes in qualitative terms the judge can recognize. Don't invent metrics or
thresholds for problems you haven't explored yet — the judge knows it when it sees it.
Quantitative gates are fine only when you are certain they survive contact with reality.
- Subtasks are the steps inside a goal; add them when a goal has 3+ distinct steps, skip otherwise.
- Two goals that share one discriminator are one goal. Merge them instead of padding the count.
- Two goals that share one discriminator are one goal. Merge them.
- Everything above "## Log" is the part the model carries while it works. Keep it under 50 lines,
reviewable in one pass. Everything below "## Log" is unlimited.