[rllib] example and docs on how to use parametric actions with DQN / PG algorithms (#3384)

This commit is contained in:
Eric Liang
2018-11-27 23:35:19 -08:00
committed by GitHub
parent c2108ca64f
commit f0df97db6f
15 changed files with 366 additions and 45 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ Tuned examples: `Pendulum-v0 <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/pyt
:start-after: __sphinx_doc_begin__
:end-before: __sphinx_doc_end__
Deep Q Networks (DQN, Rainbow)
------------------------------
Deep Q Networks (DQN, Rainbow, Parametric DQN)
----------------------------------------------
`[paper] <https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5602>`__ `[implementation] <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/agents/dqn/dqn.py>`__
RLlib DQN is implemented using the SyncReplayOptimizer. The algorithm can be scaled by increasing the number of workers, using the AsyncGradientsOptimizer for async DQN, or using Ape-X. Memory usage is reduced by compressing samples in the replay buffer with LZ4. All of the DQN improvements evaluated in `Rainbow <https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02298>`__ are available, though not all are enabled by default.
RLlib DQN is implemented using the SyncReplayOptimizer. The algorithm can be scaled by increasing the number of workers, using the AsyncGradientsOptimizer for async DQN, or using Ape-X. Memory usage is reduced by compressing samples in the replay buffer with LZ4. All of the DQN improvements evaluated in `Rainbow <https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02298>`__ are available, though not all are enabled by default. See also how to use `parametric-actions in DQN <rllib-models.html#variable-length-parametric-action-spaces>`__.
Tuned examples: `PongDeterministic-v4 <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/tuned_examples/pong-dqn.yaml>`__, `Rainbow configuration <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/tuned_examples/pong-rainbow.yaml>`__, `{BeamRider,Breakout,Qbert,SpaceInvaders}NoFrameskip-v4 <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/tuned_examples/atari-basic-dqn.yaml>`__, `with Dueling and Double-Q <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/tuned_examples/atari-duel-ddqn.yaml>`__, `with Distributional DQN <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/tuned_examples/atari-dist-dqn.yaml>`__.
+16 -14
View File
@@ -7,20 +7,22 @@ RLlib works with several different types of environments, including `OpenAI Gym
**Compatibility matrix**:
============= ================ ================== =========== ==================
Algorithm Discrete Actions Continuous Actions Multi-Agent Recurrent Policies
============= ================ ================== =========== ==================
A2C, A3C **Yes** **Yes** **Yes** **Yes**
PPO **Yes** **Yes** **Yes** **Yes**
PG **Yes** **Yes** **Yes** **Yes**
IMPALA **Yes** No **Yes** **Yes**
DQN, Rainbow **Yes** No **Yes** No
DDPG, TD3 No **Yes** **Yes** No
APEX-DQN **Yes** No **Yes** No
APEX-DDPG No **Yes** **Yes** No
ES **Yes** **Yes** No No
ARS **Yes** **Yes** No No
============= ================ ================== =========== ==================
============= ======================= ================== =========== ==================
Algorithm Discrete Actions Continuous Actions Multi-Agent Recurrent Policies
============= ======================= ================== =========== ==================
A2C, A3C **Yes** `+parametric`_ **Yes** **Yes** **Yes**
PPO **Yes** `+parametric`_ **Yes** **Yes** **Yes**
PG **Yes** `+parametric`_ **Yes** **Yes** **Yes**
IMPALA **Yes** `+parametric`_ No **Yes** **Yes**
DQN, Rainbow **Yes** `+parametric`_ No **Yes** No
DDPG, TD3 No **Yes** **Yes** No
APEX-DQN **Yes** `+parametric`_ No **Yes** No
APEX-DDPG No **Yes** **Yes** No
ES **Yes** **Yes** No No
ARS **Yes** **Yes** No No
============= ======================= ================== =========== ==================
.. _`+parametric`: rllib-models.html#variable-length-parametric-action-spaces
In the high-level agent APIs, environments are identified with string names. By default, the string will be interpreted as a gym `environment name <https://gym.openai.com/envs>`__, however you can also register custom environments by name:
+84
View File
@@ -110,6 +110,43 @@ Custom models should subclass the common RLlib `model class <https://github.com/
For a full example of a custom model in code, see the `Carla RLlib model <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/examples/carla/models.py>`__ and associated `training scripts <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/tree/master/python/ray/rllib/examples/carla>`__. You can also reference the `unit tests <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/test/test_nested_spaces.py>`__ for Tuple and Dict spaces, which show how to access nested observation fields.
Custom Recurrent Models
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Instead of using the ``use_lstm: True`` option, it can be preferable use a custom recurrent model. This provides more control over postprocessing of the LSTM output and can also allow the use of multiple LSTM cells to process different portions of the input. The only difference from a normal custom model is that you have to define ``self.state_init``, ``self.state_in``, and ``self.state_out``. You can refer to the existing `lstm.py <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/models/lstm.py>`__ model as an example to implement your own model:
.. code-block:: python
class MyCustomLSTM(Model):
def _build_layers_v2(self, input_dict, num_outputs, options):
# Some initial layers to process inputs, shape [BATCH, OBS...].
features = some_hidden_layers(input_dict["obs"])
# Add back the nested time dimension for tf.dynamic_rnn, new shape
# will be [BATCH, MAX_SEQ_LEN, OBS...].
last_layer = add_time_dimension(features, self.seq_lens)
# Setup the LSTM cell (see lstm.py for an example)
lstm = rnn.BasicLSTMCell(256, state_is_tuple=True)
self.state_init = ...
self.state_in = ...
lstm_out, lstm_state = tf.nn.dynamic_rnn(
lstm,
last_layer,
initial_state=...,
sequence_length=self.seq_lens,
time_major=False,
dtype=tf.float32)
self.state_out = list(lstm_state)
# Drop the time dimension again so back to shape [BATCH, OBS...].
# Note that we retain the zero padding (see issue #2992).
last_layer = tf.reshape(lstm_out, [-1, cell_size])
logits = linear(last_layer, num_outputs, "action",
normc_initializer(0.01))
return logits, last_layer
Custom Preprocessors
--------------------
@@ -188,6 +225,53 @@ Then, you can create an agent with your custom policy graph by:
In this example we overrode existing methods of the existing DDPG policy graph, i.e., `_build_q_network`, `_build_p_network`, `_build_action_network`, `_build_actor_critic_loss`, but you can also replace the entire graph class entirely.
Variable-length / Parametric Action Spaces
------------------------------------------
Custom models can be used to work with environments where (1) the set of valid actions varies per step, and/or (2) the number of valid actions is very large, as in `OpenAI Five <https://neuro.cs.ut.ee/the-use-of-embeddings-in-openai-five/>`__ and `Horizon <https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00260>`__. The general idea is that the meaning of actions can be completely conditioned on the observation, that is, the ``a`` in ``Q(s, a)`` is just a token in ``[0, MAX_AVAIL_ACTIONS)`` that only has meaning in the context of ``s``. This works with algorithms in the `DQN and policy-gradient families <rllib-env.html>`__ and can be implemented as follows:
1. The environment should return a mask and/or list of valid action embeddings as part of the observation for each step. To enable batching, the number of actions can be allowed to vary from 1 to some max number:
.. code-block:: python
class MyParamActionEnv(gym.Env):
def __init__(self, max_avail_actions):
self.action_space = Discrete(max_avail_actions)
self.observation_space = Dict({
"action_mask": Box(0, 1, shape=(max_avail_actions, )),
"avail_actions": Box(-1, 1, shape=(max_avail_actions, action_embedding_sz)),
"real_obs": ...,
})
2. A custom model can be defined that can interpret the ``action_mask`` and ``avail_actions`` portions of the observation. Here the model computes the action logits via the dot product of some network output and each action embedding. Invalid actions can be masked out of the softmax by scaling the probability to zero:
.. code-block:: python
class MyParamActionModel(Model):
def _build_layers_v2(self, input_dict, num_outputs, options):
avail_actions = input_dict["obs"]["avail_actions"]
action_mask = input_dict["obs"]["action_mask"]
output = FullyConnectedNetwork(
input_dict["obs"]["real_obs"], num_outputs=action_embedding_sz)
# Expand the model output to [BATCH, 1, EMBED_SIZE]. Note that the
# avail actions tensor is of shape [BATCH, MAX_ACTIONS, EMBED_SIZE].
intent_vector = tf.expand_dims(output, 1)
# Shape of logits is [BATCH, MAX_ACTIONS].
action_logits = tf.reduce_sum(avail_actions * intent_vector, axis=2)
# Mask out invalid actions (use tf.float32.min for stability)
inf_mask = tf.maximum(tf.log(action_mask), tf.float32.min)
masked_logits = inf_mask + action_logits
return masked_logits, last_layer
Depending on your use case it may make sense to use just the masking, just action embeddings, or both. For a runnable example of this in code, check out `parametric_action_cartpole.py <https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/python/ray/rllib/examples/parametric_action_cartpole.py>`__. Note that since masking introduces ``tf.float32.min`` values into the model output, this technique might not work with all algorithm options. For example, algorithms might crash if they incorrectly process the ``tf.float32.min`` values. The cartpole example has working configurations for DQN and several policy gradient algorithms.
Model-Based Rollouts
--------------------
+2 -2
View File
@@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ In an example below, we train A2C by specifying 8 workers through the config fla
python ray/python/ray/rllib/train.py --env=PongDeterministic-v4 \
--run=A2C --config '{"num_workers": 8}'
.. image:: rllib-config.svg
Specifying Resources
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can control the degree of parallelism used by setting the ``num_workers`` hyperparameter for most agents. The number of GPUs the driver should use can be set via the ``num_gpus`` option. Similarly, the resource allocation to workers can be controlled via ``num_cpus_per_worker``, ``num_gpus_per_worker``, and ``custom_resources_per_worker``. The number of GPUs can be a fractional quantity to allocate only a fraction of a GPU. For example, with DQN you can pack five agents onto one GPU by setting ``num_gpus: 0.2``. Note that in Ray < 0.6.0 fractional GPU support requires setting the environment variable ``RAY_USE_XRAY=1``.
.. image:: rllib-config.svg
Common Parameters
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+2 -1
View File
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Algorithms
- `Deep Deterministic Policy Gradients (DDPG, TD3) <rllib-algorithms.html#deep-deterministic-policy-gradients-ddpg-td3>`__
- `Deep Q Networks (DQN, Rainbow) <rllib-algorithms.html#deep-q-networks-dqn-rainbow>`__
- `Deep Q Networks (DQN, Rainbow, Parametric DQN) <rllib-algorithms.html#deep-q-networks-dqn-rainbow-parametric-dqn>`__
- `Policy Gradients <rllib-algorithms.html#policy-gradients>`__
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ Models and Preprocessors
* `Custom Models <rllib-models.html#custom-models>`__
* `Custom Preprocessors <rllib-models.html#custom-preprocessors>`__
* `Customizing Policy Graphs <rllib-models.html#customizing-policy-graphs>`__
* `Variable-length / Parametric Action Spaces <rllib-models.html#variable-length-parametric-action-spaces>`__
* `Model-Based Rollouts <rllib-models.html#model-based-rollouts>`__
RLlib Concepts
+38 -19
View File
@@ -30,16 +30,21 @@ class QNetwork(object):
sigma0=0.5):
self.model = model
with tf.variable_scope("action_value"):
action_out = model.last_layer
for i in range(len(hiddens)):
if use_noisy:
action_out = self.noisy_layer("hidden_%d" % i, action_out,
hiddens[i], sigma0)
else:
action_out = layers.fully_connected(
action_out,
num_outputs=hiddens[i],
activation_fn=tf.nn.relu)
if hiddens:
action_out = model.last_layer
for i in range(len(hiddens)):
if use_noisy:
action_out = self.noisy_layer(
"hidden_%d" % i, action_out, hiddens[i], sigma0)
else:
action_out = layers.fully_connected(
action_out,
num_outputs=hiddens[i],
activation_fn=tf.nn.relu)
else:
# Avoid postprocessing the outputs. This enables custom models
# to be used for parametric action DQN.
action_out = model.outputs
if use_noisy:
action_scores = self.noisy_layer(
"output",
@@ -47,11 +52,13 @@ class QNetwork(object):
num_actions * num_atoms,
sigma0,
non_linear=False)
else:
elif hiddens:
action_scores = layers.fully_connected(
action_out,
num_outputs=num_actions * num_atoms,
activation_fn=None)
else:
action_scores = model.outputs
if num_atoms > 1:
# Distributional Q-learning uses a discrete support z
# to represent the action value distribution
@@ -107,7 +114,7 @@ class QNetwork(object):
self.logits = support_logits_per_action
self.dist = support_prob_per_action
else:
action_scores_mean = tf.reduce_mean(action_scores, 1)
action_scores_mean = _reduce_mean_ignore_inf(action_scores, 1)
action_scores_centered = action_scores - tf.expand_dims(
action_scores_mean, 1)
self.value = state_score + action_scores_centered
@@ -176,11 +183,15 @@ class QValuePolicy(object):
def __init__(self, q_values, observations, num_actions, stochastic, eps):
deterministic_actions = tf.argmax(q_values, axis=1)
batch_size = tf.shape(observations)[0]
random_actions = tf.random_uniform(
tf.stack([batch_size]),
minval=0,
maxval=num_actions,
dtype=tf.int64)
# Special case masked out actions (q_value ~= -inf) so that we don't
# even consider them for exploration.
random_valid_action_logits = tf.where(
tf.equal(q_values, tf.float32.min),
tf.ones_like(q_values) * tf.float32.min, tf.ones_like(q_values))
random_actions = tf.squeeze(
tf.multinomial(random_valid_action_logits, 1), axis=1)
chose_random = tf.random_uniform(
tf.stack([batch_size]), minval=0, maxval=1, dtype=tf.float32) < eps
stochastic_actions = tf.where(chose_random, random_actions,
@@ -368,8 +379,8 @@ class DQNPolicyGraph(TFPolicyGraph):
qnet = QNetwork(
ModelCatalog.get_model({
"obs": obs
}, space, 1, self.config["model"]), self.num_actions,
self.config["dueling"], self.config["hiddens"],
}, space, self.num_actions, self.config["model"]),
self.num_actions, self.config["dueling"], self.config["hiddens"],
self.config["noisy"], self.config["num_atoms"],
self.config["v_min"], self.config["v_max"], self.config["sigma0"])
return qnet.value, qnet.logits, qnet.dist, qnet.model
@@ -507,6 +518,14 @@ def _postprocess_dqn(policy_graph, sample_batch):
return batch
def _reduce_mean_ignore_inf(x, axis):
"""Same as tf.reduce_mean() but ignores -inf values."""
mask = tf.not_equal(x, tf.float32.min)
x_zeroed = tf.where(mask, x, tf.zeros_like(x))
return (tf.reduce_sum(x_zeroed, axis) / tf.reduce_sum(
tf.cast(mask, tf.float32), axis))
def _huber_loss(x, delta=1.0):
"""Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huber_loss"""
return tf.where(
+5
View File
@@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ class PPOAgent(Agent):
and not self.config["simple_optimizer"]):
logger.warn("forcing simple_optimizer=True in multi-agent mode")
self.config["simple_optimizer"] = True
if self.config["observation_filter"] != "NoFilter":
# TODO(ekl): consider setting the default to be NoFilter
logger.warn(
"By default, observations will be normalized with {}".format(
self.config["observation_filter"]))
def _train(self):
prev_steps = self.optimizer.num_steps_sampled
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
"""Example of handling variable length and/or parametric action spaces.
This is a toy example of the action-embedding based approach for handling large
discrete action spaces (potentially infinite in size), similar to how
OpenAI Five works:
https://neuro.cs.ut.ee/the-use-of-embeddings-in-openai-five/
This currently works with RLlib's policy gradient style algorithms
(e.g., PG, PPO, IMPALA, A2C) and also DQN.
Note that since the model outputs now include "-inf" tf.float32.min
values, not all algorithm options are supported at the moment. For example,
algorithms might crash if they don't properly ignore the -inf action scores.
Working configurations are given below.
"""
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import division
from __future__ import print_function
import argparse
import random
import numpy as np
import gym
from gym.spaces import Box, Discrete, Dict
import tensorflow as tf
import tensorflow.contrib.slim as slim
import ray
from ray.rllib.models import Model, ModelCatalog
from ray.rllib.models.misc import normc_initializer
from ray.tune import run_experiments
from ray.tune.registry import register_env
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--stop", type=int, default=200)
parser.add_argument("--run", type=str, default="PPO")
class ParametricActionCartpole(gym.Env):
"""Parametric action version of CartPole.
In this env there are only ever two valid actions, but we pretend there are
actually up to `max_avail_actions` actions that can be taken, and the two
valid actions are randomly hidden among this set.
At each step, we emit a dict of:
- the actual cart observation
- a mask of valid actions (e.g., [0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1] for 6 max avail)
- the list of action embeddings (w/ zeroes for invalid actions) (e.g.,
[[0, 0],
[0, 0],
[-0.2322, -0.2569],
[0, 0],
[0, 0],
[0.7878, 1.2297]] for max_avail_actions=6)
In a real environment, the actions embeddings would be larger than two
units of course, and also there would be a variable number of valid actions
per step instead of always [LEFT, RIGHT].
"""
def __init__(self, max_avail_actions):
# Use simple random 2-unit action embeddings for [LEFT, RIGHT]
self.left_action_embed = np.random.randn(2)
self.right_action_embed = np.random.randn(2)
self.action_space = Discrete(max_avail_actions)
self.wrapped = gym.make("CartPole-v0")
self.observation_space = Dict({
"action_mask": Box(0, 1, shape=(max_avail_actions, )),
"avail_actions": Box(-1, 1, shape=(max_avail_actions, 2)),
"cart": self.wrapped.observation_space,
})
def update_avail_actions(self):
self.action_assignments = [[0, 0]] * self.action_space.n
self.action_mask = [0] * self.action_space.n
self.left_idx, self.right_idx = random.sample(
range(self.action_space.n), 2)
self.action_assignments[self.left_idx] = self.left_action_embed
self.action_assignments[self.right_idx] = self.right_action_embed
self.action_mask[self.left_idx] = 1
self.action_mask[self.right_idx] = 1
def reset(self):
self.update_avail_actions()
return {
"action_mask": self.action_mask,
"avail_actions": self.action_assignments,
"cart": self.wrapped.reset(),
}
def step(self, action):
if action == self.left_idx:
actual_action = 0
elif action == self.right_idx:
actual_action = 1
else:
raise ValueError(
"Chosen action was not one of the non-zero action embeddings",
action, self.action_assignments, self.action_mask,
self.left_idx, self.right_idx)
orig_obs, rew, done, info = self.wrapped.step(actual_action)
self.update_avail_actions()
obs = {
"action_mask": self.action_mask,
"avail_actions": self.action_assignments,
"cart": orig_obs,
}
return obs, rew, done, info
class ParametricActionsModel(Model):
"""Parametric action model that handles the dot product and masking.
This assumes the outputs are logits for a single Categorical action dist.
Getting this to work with a more complex output (e.g., if the action space
is a tuple of several distributions) is also possible but left as an
exercise to the reader.
"""
def _build_layers_v2(self, input_dict, num_outputs, options):
# Extract the available actions tensor from the observation.
avail_actions = input_dict["obs"]["avail_actions"]
action_mask = input_dict["obs"]["action_mask"]
action_embed_size = avail_actions.shape[2].value
if num_outputs != avail_actions.shape[1].value:
raise ValueError(
"This model assumes num outputs is equal to max avail actions",
num_outputs, avail_actions)
# Standard FC net component.
last_layer = input_dict["obs"]["cart"]
hiddens = [256, 256]
for i, size in enumerate(hiddens):
label = "fc{}".format(i)
last_layer = slim.fully_connected(
last_layer,
size,
weights_initializer=normc_initializer(1.0),
activation_fn=tf.nn.tanh,
scope=label)
output = slim.fully_connected(
last_layer,
action_embed_size,
weights_initializer=normc_initializer(0.01),
activation_fn=None,
scope="fc_out")
# Expand the model output to [BATCH, 1, EMBED_SIZE]. Note that the
# avail actions tensor is of shape [BATCH, MAX_ACTIONS, EMBED_SIZE].
intent_vector = tf.expand_dims(output, 1)
# Batch dot product => shape of logits is [BATCH, MAX_ACTIONS].
action_logits = tf.reduce_sum(avail_actions * intent_vector, axis=2)
# Mask out invalid actions (use tf.float32.min for stability)
inf_mask = tf.maximum(tf.log(action_mask), tf.float32.min)
masked_logits = inf_mask + action_logits
return masked_logits, last_layer
if __name__ == "__main__":
args = parser.parse_args()
ray.init()
ModelCatalog.register_custom_model("pa_model", ParametricActionsModel)
register_env("pa_cartpole", lambda _: ParametricActionCartpole(10))
if args.run == "PPO":
cfg = {
"observation_filter": "NoFilter", # don't filter the action list
"vf_share_layers": True, # don't create duplicate value model
}
elif args.run == "DQN":
cfg = {
"hiddens": [], # don't postprocess the action scores
}
else:
cfg = {}
run_experiments({
"parametric_cartpole": {
"run": args.run,
"env": "pa_cartpole",
"stop": {
"episode_reward_mean": args.stop,
},
"config": dict({
"model": {
"custom_model": "pa_model",
},
"num_workers": 0,
}, **cfg),
},
})
+1 -1
View File
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ class ModelCatalog(object):
seq_lens):
if options.get("custom_model"):
model = options["custom_model"]
logger.info("Using custom model {}".format(model))
logger.debug("Using custom model {}".format(model))
return _global_registry.get(RLLIB_MODEL, model)(
input_dict,
obs_space,
+3
View File
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import division
from __future__ import print_function
from collections import OrderedDict
import cv2
import logging
import numpy as np
@@ -164,6 +165,8 @@ class DictFlatteningPreprocessor(Preprocessor):
return (size, )
def transform(self, observation):
if not isinstance(observation, OrderedDict):
observation = OrderedDict(sorted(list(observation.items())))
assert len(observation) == len(self.preprocessors), \
(len(observation), len(self.preprocessors))
return np.concatenate([
@@ -27,5 +27,5 @@ basic-dqn:
prioritized_replay_alpha: 0.5
beta_annealing_fraction: 1.0
final_prioritized_replay_beta: 1.0
num_gpus: 1
num_gpus: 0.2
timesteps_per_iteration: 10000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Runs on a single g3.16xl node
# Runs on a single g3.4xl node
# See https://github.com/ray-project/rl-experiments for results
atari-basic-dqn:
env:
@@ -29,5 +29,5 @@ atari-basic-dqn:
prioritized_replay_alpha: 0.5
beta_annealing_fraction: 1.0
final_prioritized_replay_beta: 1.0
num_gpus: 1
num_gpus: 0.2
timesteps_per_iteration: 10000
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
# Runs on a single g3.4xl node
# See https://github.com/ray-project/rl-experiments for results
dueling-ddqn:
env:
grid_search:
@@ -27,5 +29,5 @@ dueling-ddqn:
prioritized_replay_alpha: 0.5
beta_annealing_fraction: 1.0
final_prioritized_replay_beta: 1.0
num_gpus: 1
num_gpus: 0.2
timesteps_per_iteration: 10000
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ pong-impala-fast:
config:
sample_batch_size: 50
train_batch_size: 1000
num_workers: 256
num_workers: 128
num_envs_per_worker: 5
broadcast_interval: 5
max_sample_requests_in_flight_per_worker: 1
@@ -257,6 +257,15 @@ docker run --rm --shm-size=10G --memory=10G $DOCKER_SHA \
docker run --rm --shm-size=10G --memory=10G $DOCKER_SHA \
python /ray/python/ray/rllib/test/test_external_env.py
docker run --rm --shm-size=10G --memory=10G $DOCKER_SHA \
python /ray/python/ray/rllib/examples/parametric_action_cartpole.py --run=PG --stop=50
docker run --rm --shm-size=10G --memory=10G $DOCKER_SHA \
python /ray/python/ray/rllib/examples/parametric_action_cartpole.py --run=PPO --stop=50
docker run --rm --shm-size=10G --memory=10G $DOCKER_SHA \
python /ray/python/ray/rllib/examples/parametric_action_cartpole.py --run=DQN --stop=50
docker run --rm --shm-size=10G --memory=10G $DOCKER_SHA \
python /ray/python/ray/rllib/test/test_lstm.py