Files

90 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

## [BST] Rational fiction about the US president?
* Author: u/None *
* URL:
* Score: 1
* Created: 2015-07-26T12:29:31
### Post:
[deleted]
### Comments:
> **u/ArgentStonecutter** [+1] *Emergency Mustelid Hologram* (50 minutes later)
>
> > A problem might be that the president and his team is already quite instrumentally rational,
>
> Are they? Even if, as individuals, they happen to be rational (and that's not even a given) they're beholden by bonds of gold to groups that impose irrational constraints on their actions.
>
> Imagine a president who decides they're not going to worry about re-election, or even party loyalties, and decides to simply do the most good.
>> **u/PeridexisErrant** [+1] *put aside fear for courage, and death for life* (an hour later)
>>
>> > Imagine a president who decides they're not going to worry about re-election, or even party loyalties, and decides to simply do the most good.
>>
>> It's not clear to me that this would be an advantage - with the various checks and balances, the President has little power if not supported by his or her party. Revealing secrets can only get you so far, after all...
>>
>> How's this for an idea:
>>
>> > After the annual Intelligence Community dinner, the president discover's s/he's been poisoned and only has a year to live. Four months to prepare, and leave office with a legacy to be proud of. Four months in retirement, digging for the truth and preparing. And four months between the faked and real death, to get revenge...
>>
>> Featuring complex goals, many many layers of secrets and intrigue, and it can come in basically whatever flavour you want - Doctrow, Clancy, Rand...
>>> **u/ArgentStonecutter** [+1] *Emergency Mustelid Hologram* (an hour later)
>>>
>>> > Revealing secrets can only get you so far, after all...
>>>
>>> Depends on what the secrets are. This is fiction, after all.
>>>
>>> "Here we go again, another president, another mouth we have to keep shut."
>>>
>>> "Don't worry about this one, he's a solid part of the machine."
>>>
>>> "I know, but..."
>>>> **u/PeridexisErrant** [+1] *put aside fear for courage, and death for life* (2 hours later)
>>>>
>>>> Formula: Take two parts *West Wing*, one part conspiracy, and as many of the following as you feel like:
>>>>
>>>> * Snowden
>>>> * Buffy
>>>> * NASA on Mars
>>>> * Stargate
>>>> * Zombies
>>>> * Laundry Files
>>>> * Shadowrun
>>>> * Yes Minister
>>>> * A pandemic
>>>> * Harry Potter
>>>> * The Occupy movement
>>>> * Illuminati
>>>> * Soviets
>>>> * <write-in options>
>>>>
>>>> Stir well, think carefully, and serve cool with a murder on the side.
>> **u/narfanator** [+1] (an hour later)
>>
>> > Imagine a president who decides they're not going to worry about re-election, or even party loyalties, and decides to simply do the most good.
>>
>> I think this is generally what happens in years 6-8 of a president's tenure.
>>> **u/ArgentStonecutter** [+1] *Emergency Mustelid Hologram* (an hour later)
>>>
>>> Re-election, no. Party loyalties, yes. And of course by then they're a lame duck.
>> **u/None** [+1] (2 hours later)
>>
>> [deleted]
>>> **u/ArgentStonecutter** [+1] *Emergency Mustelid Hologram* (3 hours later)
>>>
>>> > there are no irrational goals in instrumental rationality
>>>
>>> That's why I wrote "irrational constraints on their actions". If you're part of a group that (for an absurd example) abominates the color green, you won't be able to cast _Avadra Kadavra_ even when that would rationally advance your goals.
---